ÿWPC  ;\ „Ë•|Ct¬UvÍÛh"&â ž½ ­"¢}Y-Ð ›IÊ'¢p¤¥•yìèïJâ¨ÂS‰YLE Æj¾eä‰å#~r“‡FROÑ²Ôæ€õã4Äx;4îÚ}KRZ;)‰Oaø‘4'‡hqJn¸øúIicÏÚS)§_43†®;Œüõ¡“Ÿa‰g&MÔúÊR}åPxå½fÅøpê!Ì\ö§4‹$½öú¢\TBéyÔ0î_áüÀ¹ªƒTmçÝÎr´úQ—v>Hú(z„x§ª ÍÚtäŠF”®uäO"7Ü%/”©g”@Þxi!©@ ¡|«„ôOöŽ*ê BºB{b{{ŠúKáv½:8ó'%£ÈgCà˜ÙÃ|ºß¤Zˆ¦…»uÿÇ@é,›sx»øbB–¶g\ð‚ö,÷L•‘I‰ÆðÛœO½­x!65l§š µ[QÌïUCÓtn"l;ü˜3êèª>¯Ž¾«¤÷0E%"r%:÷Ñä}iíÃ* Heå9î¤ã$È^|á~£ÂQlvó~Ô˜àv“ŠM£ >ŸÜudÁ>«0–Á5M,Y¢”~[ýG4ÒOë÷Cˆzj¿‡H¯ñâ£þé7+@p)# >U:I %ƒ 0(‰U:±w@ë4+?G 0”VÄê 0D®òUNö 0DD ˆ U:Œ Æ U:Ê U: Æ> ÆÆÊÆVU:Y“U:––– AQÐÆ! 0Dç B+ 0DHH D/ŒŒ B» D3ؘHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6HPBXLBÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0nLhÎ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡, øð AZ"Arial Regular çDèVéîêÓ€ôõøIùÓ€bvÁ&Þ3|x (D(2´¤$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ºÝ ƒ ´¤$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÓ  Óà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝIn€her€complaint,€the€plaintiff€stated€that€the€date€of€injury€was€November€11,€1995,Ð ° Ðand€the€defendantððs€answer€acknowledged€that€notice€of€an€injury€was€given€on€NovemberÏ4,€1995.€€Plaintiff€later€amended€her€complaint€to€allege€the€injury€was€gradually€occurringÏwith€the€last€occurrence€on€November€11,€1995.(%Ã$òòÚ  Ú1Ú  Úóó úÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X˜ÃXXXÔÔ€üXX˜ÃÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X˜ÃXüÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€30,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý úÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X˜ÃXXXÔÔ€üXX˜ÃÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X˜ÃXüÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€30,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular úÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X˜ÃXXXÔÔ€üXX˜ÃÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X˜ÃXüÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€27,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular,–ûyAZ‹"Arial RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 ùÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X˜ÃXXXÔÔ€üXX˜ÃÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X˜ÃXüÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€30,€1999ÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular ùÝ ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X˜ÃXXXÔÔ€üXX˜ÃÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X˜ÃXüÔÐ  ÐÌAugust€27,€1999ÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,–ûyAZ‹"Arial Regular !#%Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý d($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó'''÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd""""'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°Òò òÓ  ÓÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑñôññêñßr€(<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` ttx0X°ð árßñêññôññõññôñßr€(<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` ttx0X°ð árßñôññõññõñßr€(<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` ttx0X°ð árßñõññøññêñ›ñêñIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEñøñÌSPECIAL€WORKERSðð€COMPENSATION€APPEALS€PANELÌFEBRUARY€1999€SESSIONó óÐ |Ì ÐÓ:ÓÌÌÌÌò òÓ$XˆX ‘X°œX$ÓBRENDA€RAINEY,€€à h àà À àà  àó ó)ò òÐ ú J Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àó ó)ò òÐ à 0 ÐÓ3X‡X‚Ú ‘XXˆX ‘X3Óà ` àó óPlaintiff/Appellant,à h àà À àà ‚ àà  à)à Ú àHardin€Circuit€No.€2655à Ð àÐ Æ   ÐÓ9XˆX ‘XX‡X‚Ú ‘X9Óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€à  àÐ ¬ ü  ÐÓ6XˆXÚ ‘XXˆX ‘X6Óv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àNo.€02S01„9802„CV„00018Ð ’â  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àÐ xÈ  Ðò òCLEO,€INC.,à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àó ó)ò òà Ú àó óHonorable€C.€Creed€McGinley,€Judgeò òÐ ^®  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àó ó)à Ú àò òÐ D”  Ðà ` àó óDefendant/Appellee.€à À àà  à)ò òÐ *z  ÐÌÌÌòòÌÌFor€the€Appellantóóó ó:à  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú àò òòòFor€the€Appelleeó óóó:Ð ŽÞ ÐÌMitchell€G.€Tollisonà  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú àDale€H.€TuttleÐ Zª ÐHawks€&€Tollisonà  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú àMcDonald€KuhnÐ @ ÐP.€O.€Box€630à  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú à80€Monroe€Avenue,€Suite€550Ð &v ÐHumboldt,€TN€€38343à h àà À àà  àà Ú àMemphis,€TN€€38103Ð  \ ÐÌÌÌÌÌò òÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌòòÓ  ÓM€E€M€O€R€A€N€D€U€M€€€€€€O€P€I€N€I€O€NÐ .T). ÐÌÌMembers€of€Panelóó:Ð ¶0,1 ÐÌó óJustice€Janice€M.€HolderÐ ‚2Ò-3 ÐSenior€Judge€L.€T.€LaffertyÌSpecial€Judge€J.€Steven€StaffordÌÌÓ ÓÌÌÌÌÌâ âò òAFFIRMEDà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú àà  à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€LAFFERTY,€Senior€JudgeÐ ˜:è5< ÐòòÓ  ÓÑ7€˜ÃXdædÈ7ÑÔ‡¼Ý.¼XXÔO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ#†X˜ÃX¼¼Ý.â #Ôó óóóÐ ° ÐÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà ` àThis€workersðð€compensation€appeal€has€been€referred€to€the€Special€WorkersððÏCompensation€Appeals€Panel€of€the€Supreme€Court€in€accordance€with€Tenn.€Code€Ann.ÏÔ‡X˜ÃXXX˜ÃÔððÔ#†X˜ÃXXX˜Ã#Ô€50„6„225(e)(3)€for€hearing€and€reporting€to€the€Supreme€Court€of€findings€of€fact€andÐ  n Ðconclusions€of€law.€€Ìà ` àPlaintiff,€Brenda€Rainey,€has€appealed€from€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€denyingÏher€claim€for€workersðð€compensation€on€the€grounds€that€she€failed€to€carry€her€burden€ofÏproof€that€she€sustained€a€work„related€injury€in€the€course€and€scope€of€her€employmentÏand€that€she€sustained€a€permanent€anatomical€impairment€as€a€result€of€a€work„relatedÏinjury.€On€appeal,€the€only€issue€presented€by€the€plaintiff€is€whether€the€evidenceÏpreponderates€against€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€For€the€reasons€hereinafter€stated,Ïwe€find€that€it€does€not,€and,€therefore€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.Ìà ` àAt€the€time€of€trial,€the€plaintiff€testified€she€was€a€single€mother€with€two€adultÏchildren,€an€eighth€grade€education,€and€a€previous€work€history€consisting€of€factory€jobsÏand€a€nursing€home€position.€The€plaintiff€testified€she€worked€for€the€defendant€as€a€bowÏinspector€in€November,€1995.€€The€plaintiffððs€job€was€to€watch€200„300€gift€bows€go€by€onÏa€conveyor€belt€and€ð ðpick€them€out.ðð€€While€observing€the€conveyor€line€and€bows,€theÏplaintiff€testified€that€her€hands€began€hurting,€and€she€notified€her€supervisor/line€leader.׃ ×Ý ƒ %ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀РF$–# ÐThe€line€leader€replied,€ð ðWell,€youððll€be€okay,ðð€and€told€the€plaintiff€that€the€absence€wouldÏcount€against€her€if€she€left€work.€€The€plaintiff€had€previously€complained€about€her€leftÏwrist€while€employed€with€another€employer.€€She€was€seen€by€Dr.€James€Crenshaw€andÏtreated€with€wrist€bands€and€medication.€Ìà ` àOn€November€4,€1995,€the€defendant€notified€the€plaintiff€that€she€was€being€laidÏoff€and€subsequently€closed€the€factory€without€notice.€€The€plaintiff€testified€she€was€notÏfurnished€a€panel€of€physicians€from€the€defendantððs€compensation€carrier€until€herÏattorney€got€approval€for€her€to€see€Dr.€Michael€Cobb.€€The€plaintiff€lived€in€Humboldt,ÏTennessee,€and€Dr.€Cobbððs€office€was€in€Jackson,€Tennessee.€€The€plaintiff€testified€thatÐ r4Â/5 ÐDr.€Cobb€only€spent€two€or€three€minutes€with€her€and€was€rude.€€She€described€her€injuryÏas€painful,€with€episodes€of€swelling€in€her€left€hand€and€knots€in€her€arm.€€She€furtherÏtestified€that€she€had€difficulty€in€holding€dishes,€because€of€extreme€pain,€and€cannot€fish,Ïrake€leaves,€or€do€other€activities€that€she€was€accustomed€to€doing.€Ìà ` àAt€trial,€Larry€Hearod€testified€that€he€has€known€the€plaintiff€for€eighteen€or€nineteenÏyears€and€was€familiar€with€her€complaints€of€wrist€injury.€€He€testified€that€the€plaintiff€wasÏcurrently€living€in€his€home€and€had€lived€with€him€before.€€According€to€Mr.€Hearod,€theÏplaintiff€could€not€longer€vacuum€the€floors€and€frequently€complained€about€her€hands,Ïwhich€were€getting€worse.€€Hearod€denied€the€plaintiff€had€problems€with€her€hands€andÏwrists€before€her€injury€at€the€defendantððs€business.Ìà ` àSue€Spencer€testified€that€she€has€known€the€plaintiff€for€eighteen€or€nineteen€yearsÏand€has€heard€plaintiff€complain€about€pain,€tingling,€and€swelling€in€her€hands.€€She€hasÏalso€observed€the€plaintiff€dropping€dishes.€€Mrs.€Spencer€denied€that€the€plaintiff€had€wristÏproblems€prior€to€November,€1995.€Ìà ` àThe€medical€testimony€consists€of€medical€reports€of€various€physicians€filed€in€theÏrecord.€€Dr.€Ronald€C.€Bingham€conducted€an€electromyography€examination€on€theÏplaintiff€on€December€27,€1995,€and€found€normal€median€nerve€conduction€across€bothÏwrists€and€a€normal€study€of€both€upper€extremities.€Ìà ` àDr.€Michael€Cobb€filed€a€report€and€C„32€report€as€to€his€findings€regarding€theÏplaintiffððs€complaints.€€Dr.€Cobb€first€saw€the€plaintiff€on€January€11,€1996,€with€complaintsÏof€pain€and€numbness€in€both€hands,€but€more€in€the€left€hand€than€the€right.€€The€plaintiffÏdescribed€her€job€as€a€bow€inspector€who€watches€for€bad€bows€on€a€conveyor€belt.€€Dr.ÏCobb€found€no€objective€findings€of€an€injury€or€permanent€disability€and€did€not€restrict€theÏplaintiffððs€employment.€€Dr.€Cobbððs€report€established€that€the€plaintiff€missed€threeÏappointments€in€April,€May,€and€June,€1996.€€He€next€saw€the€plaintiff€on€July€17,€1996,Ïwith€diffuse€symptoms€in€her€hands€and€wrists.€€X„rays€showed€no€degenerative€changes.€ÏDr.€Cobb€found€no€chronic€neurological€problems,€excellent€range€of€motion,€good€grip,Ïand€no€signs€of€weakness.€€On€August€14,€1996,€the€plaintiff€complained€of€the€sameÏproblems,€but€an€examination€revealed€no€swelling,€no€pathology,€good€range€of€motion,Ïand€unchanged€grip€strength.€€Dr.€Cobb€found€no€signs€of€serious€injury€or€disability€andÐ Ì84: Ðopined€that€the€plaintiff€could€work€without€restriction.Ìà ` àDr.€Christian€Stewart€saw€the€plaintiff€on€November€8,€1996,€with€primary€complaintsÏof€sharp€chest€pains,€gout,€and€migraine€headaches.€€The€plaintiff€complained€that€the€painÏradiated€down€her€left€arm€and€consisted€of€pain€and€tingling.€€The€plaintiff€had€been€seenÏin€the€Humboldt€General€Hospital€in€November,€1995,€for€similar€complaints.€€Dr.€StewartÏexamined€the€plaintiff€and€found€no€impairment„related€physical€limitations.€Ìà ` àDr.€Robert€J.€Barnett€filed€a€report€and€C„32€as€to€his€findings.€€Dr.€Barnett€saw€theÏplaintiff€on€February€10,€1997,€at€the€request€of€her€attorney.€€The€plaintiffððs€EMG€andÏnerve€conduction€study€were€normal.€€After€administering€a€grip€strength€test,€Dr.€BarnettÏfound€her€grip€markedly€below€normal€on€both€sides,€but€more€significant€on€the€left.€€HeÏestimated€that€the€plaintiff€has€a€ten€percent€permanent€physical€impairment€to€the€left€armÏfrom€tendinitis€and€some€mild€nerve€root€entrapment€of€the€ulna€nerve€due€to€numbnessÏof€her€ring€and€fifth€fingers.€€Dr.€Barnettððs€C„32€report€indicated€that€the€plaintiffððsÏcomplaints€arose€out€of€her€employment.€Ìà ` àBased€on€the€testimony€and€medical€reports,€the€trial€court€was€of€the€opinion€thatÏthe€plaintiff€did€not€conjure€up€her€complaints€but€had€a€host€of€medical€problems,€includingÏheart€problems,€gout,€migraines,€and€others.€€After€reviewing€the€medical€reports,€the€trialÏcourt€found€no€objective€evidence€to€support€an€injury€arising€out€of€employment€andÏconcluded€that€the€plaintiff€failed€to€carry€her€burden€of€proof€as€to€causation€andÏpermanent€disability.€Ìà ` àOur€review€is€ò òde€novoó ó€on€the€record€accompanied€with€a€presumption€ofÐ  (ð#( Ðcorrectness€of€findings€of€fact€of€the€trial€court€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidenceÏis€otherwise.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€Ô‡X˜ÃXXX˜ÃÔððÔ#†X˜ÃXXX˜Ã¡(#Ô€50„6„225(e)(2);€òòOrman€v.€Williams€Sonoma,€Inc.€óó803Ð 8,ˆ', ÐS.W.2d€672,€675€(Tenn.€1991).€€We€are€also€mindful€that€ð ðit€is€well€settled€in€TennesseeÏthat€a€plaintiff€in€a€workerððs€compensation€suit€has€the€burden€of€proving€every€element€ofÏthe€case€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.ðð€òò€Elmore€v.€Travelers€Ins.€Co.,€óó824€S.W.2dÐ œ1ì,2 Ð541,€543€(Tenn.€1992)€(citing€òòTalley€v.€Virginia€Ins.€Reciprocalóó,€775€S.W.2d€587,€591Ð h3¸.4 Ð(Tenn.€1989)).Ìà ` àThe€defendant€contends€the€plaintiff€has€failed€to€establish,€by€expert€testimony,Ïmedical€causation€and€the€permanency€of€her€injury.€€It€is€well€established€that€medicalÐ Ì84: Ðcausation€and€permanency€of€injury€must€be€established€by€expert€testimony€in€workersððÏcompensation€cases.€òò€Aetna€Cas.€&€Sur.€Co.€v.€Long,€óó569€S.W.2d€444,€447€(Tenn.€1978).Ð |Ì ÐWhen€the€trial€court€is€faced€with€conflicting€medical€testimony€as€to€these€issues,€ð ðit€isÏwithin€the€discretion€of€the€trial€judge€to€conclude€that€the€opinion€of€certain€experts€shouldÏbe€accepted€over€that€of€other€experts€and€that€it€contains€the€more€probable€explanation.ððÐ à 0 ÐòòHinson€v.€Wal„Mart€Stores,€Inc.,€óó654€S.W.2d€675,€676„77€(Tenn.€1983).€€In€ð ðcausalÐ ¬ ü  Ðconnectionðð€cases,€facts€and€circumstances€revealed€by€lay€testimony€may€assist€the€trialÏcourt€in€the€ultimate€determination€of€that€issue,€and,€therefore,€it€is€not€exclusively€withinÏthe€realm€of€medical€science.€òò€Smith€v.€Empire€Pencil€Co.,€óó781€S.W.2d€833,€835€(Tenn.Ð ` Ð1989);€òòOwens€Illinois,€Inc.€v.€Lane,€óó576€S.W.2d€348,€349€(Tenn.€1978).€Where€the€trialÐ Ü, Ðcourt€has€seen€and€heard€witnesses,€especially€where€issues€of€credibility€and€weight€ofÏoral€testimony€are€involved,€considerable€deference€must€still€be€accorded€thoseÏcircumstances€on€review.€€All€of€the€medical€proof€was€documentary,€so€that€allÏimpressions€of€weight€and€credibility€must€be€drawn€from€the€contents€thereof,€and€notÏfrom€the€appearance€of€witnesses€on€oral€testimony€at€trial.€òò€Humphrey€v.€DavidÐ Ø( ÐWitherspoon,€Inc.,€óó734€S.W.2d€315,€315„16€(Tenn.€1987).€€Thus,€we€must€evaluate€theÐ ¤ô Ðevidence€presented€to€the€trial€court€and€ascertain€whether€or€not€it€preponderates€againstÏthe€trial€courtððs€findings.€Ìà ` àShortly€after€the€report€of€the€plaintiffððs€injury€in€November,€1995,€two€physicians,ÏDr.€Ronald€C.€Bingham€and€Dr.€Michael€Cobb,€examined€the€plaintiff€for€her€complaints.ÏDr.€Bingham€found€normal€nerve€conduction€across€both€wrists€and€a€normal€study€of€theÏupper€extremities.€€Dr.€Cobb,€who€treated€the€plaintiff€from€January€to€August,€1996,€foundÏno€objective€findings€of€an€injury€or€permanent€disability€which€restricted€the€plaintiffððsÏemployment.€€An€additional€examination€on€August€14,€1996,€revealed€no€swelling,€noÏpathology,€good€range€of€motion,€and€unchanged€grip€strength.€€Dr.€Cobb€found€no€signsÏof€serious€injury€or€disability€and€believed€the€plaintiff€could€work€without€restrictions.Ìà ` àDr.€Christian€Stewart€examined€the€plaintiff€in€November,€1996,›€for€chest€pain.€€AÏreview€of€Dr.€Stewartððs€report€reveals€the€plaintiff€did€not€complain€of€any€work„relatedÏinjuries€in€her€medical€history.€€In€a€range€of€motion€examination,€Dr.€Stewart€found€that€theÏplaintiffððs€elbows€and€wrists€were€in€the€normal€range.€€Dr.€Stewart€concluded€the€plaintiffÐ Ì84: Ðhad€no€impairment„related€physical€limitations.€Ìà ` àOn€February€10,€1997,€Dr.€Robert€J.€Barnett,€in€a€one„time€visit,€examined€theÏplaintiff€and€found€she€had€a€ten€percent€permanent€physical€impairment€to€the€left€armÏand€some€mild€nerve€root€entrapment€of€the€ulna€nerve.€€Dr.€Barnett€opined€the€medicalÏcomplaints€were€job„related.€Ìà ` àFrom€our€review€of€the€record,€œwe€believe€that€the€trial€court€properly€gave€greaterÏweight€to€the€medical€evaluations€of€Drs.€Bingham€and€Cobb.€€ñçñÌà x àñçñIn€sum,€our€review€of€theÏrecord€persuades€us€that€the€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€the€trial€courtððsÏfinding€that€the€plaintiff€failed€to€prove€any€permanent€disability€as€a€result€of€herÏemployment.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ìà ` àCosts€are€adjudged€against€the€plaintiff/appellant.ÌÌÓÓÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à________________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àL.€T.€LAFFERTY,€SENIOR€JUDGEÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌJANICE€M.€HOLDER,€JUSTICEÌÌÌÌ___________________________________Ô‡X˜ÃXXX˜ÃÔÐ î%>!% ÐJ.€STEVEN€STAFFORD,€SPECIAL€JUDGEÔ#†X˜ÃXXX˜Ãj;#Ôâ âñèñÐ  Ô&$"& ÐñèññéñѰÑÑX°Ññéññññññéññéññññññéññéñññññßt€(>.*jx´ÿ±` `€€@EÔ¹` 2ttxJ ð «tßññññññßt€(>.*jx´ÿ±` `€€@EÔ¹` 2ttxJ ð «tßñññéñà@PPDàIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@ÏÏ*DàAT€JACKSONˆÌÌÌÌBRENDA€RAINEY,€à h àà À àà  à)€à Ú àHardin€CircuitÐ l d Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àNo.€€2655Ð R J Ðà ` àPlaintiff„Appellant,à h àà À àà  à)Ð 80 Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àHon.€C.€Creed€McGinley,€JudgeÐ ü  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àÐ êâ  Ðñéññññùñßr€ (<,(j 8` `€€@E Ô` ttx0XÐð ärßñùññññéñCLEO,€INC.,€à  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àNO.€02S01„9802„CV„00018à Ð àÐ ÐÈ  Ѐ€€€€€€€à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à Ú àÐ ¶®  Ðà ` àDefendant„Appellee,à À àà  à)à Ú àAffirmedÐ œ”  ÐÌÔ‡58p5XX˜ÃÔÌÌò òà@ŽŽ(DàòòÔ#†X˜ÃX558pB#ÔJUDGMENT€ORDERóóó óˆÐ  ÐÓÖÓÌà ` àà ¸ àThis€case€is€before€the€Court€upon€motion€for€review€pursuant€to€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€50„6„225(e)(5)(B),€the€entire€record,€including€the€order€of€referral€to€the€SpecialÏWorkers'€Compensation€Appeals€Panel,€and€the€Panel's€Memorandum€Opinion€settingÏforth€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law,€which€are€incorporated€herein€by€reference;ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€motion€for€review€is€not€well„¼taken€and€should€be€denied;€andÌÌà ` àà ¸ àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panel's€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€lawÏare€adopted€and€affirmed,€and€the€decision€of€the€Panel€is€made€the€judgment€of€the€Court.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àCosts€are€taxed€to€the€plaintiff„appellant€and€her€surety,€for€which€executionÏmay€issue€if€necessary.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àIT€IS€SO€ORDERED.ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà Ú àPER€CURIAMÌÌÌHolder,€J.,€Not€ParticipatingÐ z