ÿWPCÈ ÓM¶¯¬wzÐ|ã» 8Uç¿,§ Ö’Á€Ä‰vˆ~Ô,T•œ°#«yD+3ûÃì £=¤­Tò×­! ¾÷(åb”Åü1Q›:bÚéÿj \°Âstâ´ÉŸ r#d«hZ=T“íFù¢¢î€”™ñË‘„‘éÅ"ÄßU»'×m¯ìèÆ*“»ª37WX±‚÷r\ž~TÀB..¡ä­-øÚXæ>ö³–Y‚é¯Þh†|蚘èòòÅØìkQ9ÊXZÑlž}9ø»$—_cõÄ›BÞzʱDíˉ‘C˜Bæ Œ)×U9f0?WØ|¼<P”‘¼QçOý㮳L—:Œzqè~dÎŒ:D׆!ß#GUßšžïdTö[ï9%)‰™‚fG«WÓ ¬†|,íÚ0Ùåäñºð¨úsªœ&k-DÐ\Ž Ðyêm¦8aÊ£“2Œ7aÂ4¬’•¬ú³4?M…cX1+o‰kõ€9|†¢}X¶h­ˆ3:¶u]ªðãg˜{ù V&¡w¿úY3Ð|6ÒÂ=€akl%1 Q­ •çÖ àÀó×ûÍ»sãb«y«è2\Ì¥e<0›Y|¨…k„QF Í&Û›eªèÚ¥îVC¹#! U :? %y 0û wz4~’¡N© 0@« 0DëY/ƈUNN^ œN¨ª m¬JÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà D+              B888888888888888888 ASUƨ 0n 0† 0Džž D5ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ D/ BFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AYcƼ 0F‚˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX(Óý,$¡¡Ñ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÔ€XûXXXÔÑ7€>‚XXdðXXdð7Ñ”@q'3|x(ð(3¾x$¤¤Ý ƒý,!ÝÑ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XüXXXÔÑ8€üXXdædæ8ÑÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó OÝ ƒ[8"ÝÔ€XüXXXÔÝ  ÝÔ€èäqçXXüÔÔ Ad ÔÓ  ÓÔ_ÔFILEDÔ€üÁçèäqÔÐ  ÐÌò òNovember€3,€1999Ð  ÐÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€CourtÏÔ_ÔClerkó óÔ_ÔLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regularb¢c'L ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ @Ô_ÔÔ‡èè$çXXÔÔ Ad ÔÓ  ÓFILEDÔ#†XóXçèè$#ÔԇŭXXóÔÐ  ÐÌò òNOVEMBER€3,€1999Ð  ÐÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.Ð ZZ ÐAppellate€CourtÐ úú ÐClerkó ó'ÈÈÈÈdxd dZ[\]_Eþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ð38$¢¢Ý ƒý,!ÝÑ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XüXXXÔÑ8€üXXdædæ8ÑÝ  Ý(ð38$££Ý ƒý,!ÝÑ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XüXXXÔÑ8€üXXdædæ8ÑÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óGGGG)ÿÿ!dxdx„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd·\¸:Müÿ << deUU…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(n$––ò ò(Ú  Ú1Ú  Ú)ó óÝ ƒý,!ÝÑ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XüXXXÔÑ8€üXXdædÈ8ÑÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà@Ø Ø Ìàò òIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ Ü  Ðà@5 5 ÌàSPECIAL€WORKERSðð€COMPENSATION€APPEALS€PANELˆÌßl€Y _6&"h 8 `€€Exº "tt0:°´ ¨ðlßâ °°$$âà@ì ì \àAT€KNOXVILLE€AUGUST€1999€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌâ $$°°âó óTHERESA€WALKERà h àà À àà  à)à p àHAMILTON€CHANCERYÐ 8  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiff/Appelleeà h àà À àà  à)à p àNO.€03S01„9811„CH„00139Ð à  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìv.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHON.€FRANK€BROWNÐ ¬Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àCHANCELLORÐ ’¶  ÐWHELAND€FOUNDRY,à h àà À àà  à)Ð xœ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendant/Appellantà À àà  à)Ð Dh ÐÌÌÌÌÌÌÌò òòòFor€the€Appellant:à  àà h àà À àà  àFor€the€Appellee:Ð t"˜ ÐÌó óóóDaniel€J.€Ripperà  àà h àà À àà  àJeffrey€W.€RufoloÐ L$p ÐLuther„Anderson,€PLLPà h àà À àà  àSummers€&€Wyatt,€P.C.Ð 2%V ÐP.O.€Box€151à  àà h àà À àà  à500€Lindsay€StreetÐ &< ÐChattanooga,€TN€37401„0151à À àà  àChattanooga,€TN€37402Ð þ&" ÐÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÓ  Óò òòòMEMORANDUM€OPINIONÐ ..R#' ÐÌÌÌÌMembers€of€Panel:ó óóóÐ Ê2î', ÐÌChief€Justice€E.€Riley€AndersonÌSenior€Judge€John€K.€ByersÌSpecial€Judge€Roger€E.€ThayerÌÌÌÌÌÌÐ Ì;ð06 ÐÌÌÓ  Óò òAFFIRMEDà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àà  àBYERS,€Senior€Judge€Ð R8¢39 ÐòòÓÓà ` àó óóóÐ  >9Ž4:œ Ðà ` àThis€workers'€compensation€appeal€has€been€referred€to€the€Special€Workers'Ð ° ÐCompensation€Appeals€Panel€of€the€Supreme€Court€in€accordance€with€òòTenn.€CodeÐ |Ì ÐAnnóó.€ðð€50„6„225(e)(3)€for€hearing€and€reporting€to€the€Supreme€Court€of€findings€ofÐ H˜ Ðfact€and€conclusions€of€law.Ð  d Ðà ` àAt€the€time€of€the€trial€of€this€case,€the€plaintiff€was€36€years€of€age.€€She€hadÐ à 0 Ðobtained€a€basic€adult€education€but€had€no€particular€vocational€training.€€Prior€toÐ ¬ ü  Ðworking€for€the€defendant,€the€plaintiff€worked€primarily€in€convenience€stores.Ð xÈ  Ðà ` àThe€plaintiff€sustained€an€injury€to€her€right€shoulder€and€elbow€as€a€result€ofÐ D”  Ðan€accident€in€the€course€of€her€employment€with€the€defendant.€€The€accidentÐ ` Ðoccurred€on€August€8,€1996.€€After€prolonged€treatment,€she€underwent€surgery€onÐ Ü, ÐJune€9,€1999,€to€repair€a€torn€rotator€cuff.€€The€treating€physician€found€an€8€percentÐ ¨ø Ðwhole€body€disability.Ð tÄ Ðà ` àThe€trial€judge€awarded€the€plaintiff€45€percent€€vocational€disability€to€theÐ @ Ðbody€as€a€whole.€€Ð  \ Ðà ` àThe€defendant€says€the€evidence€does€not€support€an€award€of€45€percent,Ð Ø( Ðand€further€says€that€award€is€more€than€5€times€the€medical€impairment€rating€givenÐ ¤ô Ðby€the€doctor€and€is€not€supported€by€specific€findings€by€the€trial€judge€inÐ p!À  Ðaccordance€with€the€requirements€of€òòTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€50„6„241(c).Ð <#Œ" Ðà ` àWe€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.à È àòòÐ %X $ Ðà ` àTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€50„6„241ðð€requires€the€court€to€make€specific€findings€ofÐ Ô&$"& Ðfact€detailing€the€reasons€for€awarding€maximum€impairment€if€the€court€awardsÐ  (ð#( Ðmore€than€five€percent€impairment€to€an€injured€employee.€€In€making€an€award€ofÐ l*¼%* Ðmore€than€five€percent,€the€court€shall€consider€ð ðall€pertinent€factors,€including€layÐ 8,ˆ', Ðand€expert€testimony,€employeeððs€age,€education,€skills€and€training,€local€jobÐ .T). Ðopportunities,€and€capacity€to€work€at€types€of€employment€available€in€claimantððsÐ Ð/ +0 Ðdisabled€condition.ðð€òòTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€50„6„241(c).€€€The€plaintiffððs€treatingÐ œ1ì,2 Ðphysician€was€of€the€opinion€the€plaintiff€could€not€do€any€overhead€work€or€repetitiveÐ h3¸.4 Ðlifting€with€her€right€arm€and€that€she€suffered€an€8€percent€vocational€disability.€€TheÐ 45„06 Ðplaintiff€was€discharged€by€the€defendant€because€the€restrictions€placed€on€herÐ 7P28 Ðcould€not€be€accommodated€on€the€job.€€The€plaintiff€sought€and€obtained€work€atÐ Ì84: Ðvarious€places€but€was€unable€to€do€many€of€the€jobs€because€of€her€inability€to€doÐ ° Ðany€significant€lifting.€€In€fixing€the€award,€the€trial€judge€found,€òòinter€aliaóó:Ð |Ì ÐÌÒHÒÒ` ÒLooking€at€the€other€factors,€the€Court€notes€that€the€plaintiff€is€36Ð  h Ðyears€old.€€She€has€a€high€school€education.€€She€has€little€formalÐ ä 4 Ðeducation€above€the€high€school€level.€€She€has€had€skills€that€sheÐ °  Ðhas€developed€with€the€use€of€some€computers,€and€she€has€beenÐ |Ì  Ðtrained€as€a€receptionist€and€also€been€trained€as€a€manager€of€aÐ H˜  Ðconvenience€store€and€as€a€cashier.€€The€management€position€andÐ d Ðother€employments€at€convenience€stores€generally€involved€liftingÐ à0 Ðand€carrying€of€weighty€objects.€€Ð ¬ü Ðà ¸ àShe€has€testified€with€regard€to€the€applications€that€she€hasÐ xÈ Ðput€in€for€employment€at€various€places,€as€well€as€the€discussionsÐ D” Ðshe€has€had€with€a€former€employer€and€others€regarding€herÐ ` Ðdisability€and€how€that€affects€her€ability€to€do€certain€jobs.Ð Ü, Ðà@¸¸+Tà****ˆÐ ¨ø Ðà ¸ àIt€is€obvious€to€the€Court€that€this€young€lady€is€not€able€toÐ t!Ä  Ðmake€the€kind€of€money€that€she€was€making€at€Ô_ÔWhelandÔ_Ô€for€theÐ @#" Ðtime€that€she€was€there.Ð  %\ $ ÐÒ` ÒÒHôÒÌ€The€above€finding,€in€our€view,€satisfies€the€requirement€of€òòTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€50„6„Ð ¤(ô#( Ð241(c),€and€supports€the€award€of€more€than€five€times€the€medical€impairmentÐ p*À%* Ðrating.€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€the€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÐ <,Œ', Ðand€we€affirm€the€same.Ð .X). Ðà ` àThe€defendant€asks€us€to€reduce€the€award€in€the€case€to€something€similar€toÐ Ô/$+0 Ðan€amount€an€award€was€reduced€in€a€case€passed€upon€by€the€WorkerððsÐ  1ð,2 ÐCompensation€panel,€which€is€similar€to€this€case.€€Proportionality€review€is€notÐ l3¼.4 Ðapplicable€to€workerððs€compensation€cases.Ð 85ˆ06 Ðà ` àÐ  7T28 ÐÔ_Ôà ` àThe€costs€of€the€appeal€are€taxed€to€the€defendant.Ð ° ÐÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ b² Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJohn€K.€Byers,€Senior€JudgeÐ H˜ ÐÌÌCONCUR:Ð ú J ÐÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ ¬ ü  ÐE.€Riley€Anderson,€Chief€JusticeÐ ’â  ÐÌÌòòÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ ` ÐRoger€E.€Thayer,€Special€JudgeÐ öF ÐÒ` ÒÐ Ü, ÐÔ‡XŠ)XXXóÔÐ ° ÐÔ_Ôßn€Y_8($hxóR `€€Ekò"tt0:£ ¨<nßÔ_Ôâ ` £` £` $` $âÌà@/ / à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€IN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEE€ˆÐ à Ðà@55à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€AT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ €Ð Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àà  àà x àÌÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€à p àÐ P   Ðà  àà ° àà  àà ` àà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àÌTHERESA€WALKERà À à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)€€€€€HAMILTONÐ 0 € Ðâ ` $` $` £` £âCHANCERYà  àà h àà À à€€€€€à  àà p à€€€€€à È à€€€€€)à  àÐ  p  ÐÒ HÒ€€à ¸ àPlaintiff„Appelleeà À à€€€€€€€à  à€€€€€)à p àà È àà  àà x àà Ð àÐ `  ÐÓ àœX°œXÓà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€€€)à p àNo.€03S01„9811„CH„00139à Ð àÐ P  Ðv.à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà0  à€€€€€)Ðð@ 8"8" Ðà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€€€)à p àHon.€Frank€Brown€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à Ð àÐ à0  Ðà ¸ àà  à€€€€€à h àà À à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à p àChancellorÐ Ð  ÐÔ_ÔWHELANDÔ_Ô€FOUNDRY,à À àà  à€€€€€)à p àà È àà  àà x àà Ð àÐ À Ðà ¸ à€€€€€à  àà h àà À àà  à€€€€€)à p à€€€à È àÐ ° Ðà ¸ àDefendant„Appellant.à À à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ð  ð Ðà ¸ àÌà ¸ àà  à€€€€€à h àà À àà  àà p àà È à€€€€€Ð €Ð Ѐ€€€à ¸ àà  àà h à€€€€€€€€€à À à€€€€€€€€€€Ð pÀ ÐÌà ¸ àà  àà h à€€€€€€€€JUDGMENT€ORDERÐ P  ÐÌÓ€Óà ¸ à€This€case€is€before€the€Court€upon€the€entire€record,€including€theÐ 0€ Ðorder€of€referral€to€the€Special€Workers'€Compensation€Appeals€Panel,€and€theÐ ˜è ÐPanel's€memorandum€Opinion€setting€forth€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusionsÐ P Ðof€law,€which€are€incorporated€herein€by€reference;Ð h¸ ÐÌà ¸ àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€memorandum€Opinion€ofÐ 8"ˆ" Ðthe€Panel€should€be€accepted€and€approved;€andÐ  #ð$ ÐÌà ¸ àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panel's€findings€of€facts€andÐ p&À!( Ðconclusions€of€law€are€adopted€and€affirmed€and€the€decision€of€the€Panel€isÐ Ø'(#* Ðmade€the€Judgment€of€the€Court.Ð @)$, ÐÌà ¸ àCosts€on€appeal€are€taxed€to€the€appellant,€Ô_ÔWhelandÔ_Ô€Foundry€andÐ ,`'0 ÐDaniel€J.€Ripper,€surety,€€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.€Ð x-È(2 Ѐ€€€€€11/03/99Ô#†XóXXXŠ)›##ÔÐ à.0*4 ÐÌÌÌà ¸ à