ÿWPC. MZ¥VÌêÔü‘qC=?%w´ÁU0Û¹½û6×[fj{:Ĭ¢~Y±Õòj. \­Öó4?æçsç:OÓ–6ó„)¹Hc×H•íh©×CmX2 g¸n“Ög”L€žæWæK®Ÿ®·Š5“›AwXAÓ†~—'-edánJ4,fÚxq‰4ž9å rœ;@z*8ÇEWäÜ;ƒ –95ãùLtd±Ü^P'¾ >=J¤Húaœ “q"Ár w5+â6øéöw¹×¡ª{‡ Çÿ³9(Ó)aÞÅ úƒó¿˜®Ÿ´yþdu.ôArÑ?JÁEKvsGWÚË­ž¢½‚Æ(µ òï±½h,Ÿ™OG‡´«U L®rZmïÐy%䱯Q7̃Yž£½¶† ÔI‘L‡}blä÷„=Y¸àÖÌ÷øœe¡jLHƒLè)Cs¢ì¦dðúEP^` ø“¡€ÿ쉋„¡a¨T»™€ÜV.c×V#Ÿ Ñ…/ˆ>=‰”DT†£2ÜD ³· ¶“¾£‘V$Þ—HçûcšØè®i`¿í©‰ïCƒê-røU¿)PJòÒB#É€MÓçñ¹Ô,ÿV |kpNñ YŒÿZ¹ –éb %\U@b 0ˆ¢U,N*^ xw„4ˆ zœÒ è ÷ mù #Á ÆÑ Æ— Æ] Æ#UNéN79NAEC zEÒ¿¿UN‘ 0Dßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßb#################################### 0ë++++ B  0¤3 D3× D-  0K77 AS‚ÆÕ 0¤› 0D? A«ƒ»(ÈhH  Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularáx|+â j-+ ȣ𡘨 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LJ 4000/4050 PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G2Ç$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€•»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€XUX»»Ô d(|3n$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€•»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3n$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€•»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼…»»»ÔÑ8€XéXXdì»»d8ÑÓ  ÓÔ‡î$…Ôà@@7 7 ìàIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐSPECIAL€WORKERSðð€COMPENSATION€APPEALS€PANELÐ Ö& Ðà@@ƒƒìàAT€NASHVILLEà0 @ àÔ#†¼…»îî$î#ÔÐ üL ÐJuly€26,€2001€SessionÐ "r ÐÔ‡XXéX»¼…ÔÌò òÔ#†¼…»XXXé"#ÔÔ_ÔKARYÔ_Ô€RAY€FRAZIERòòóó€v.€BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE,€INC.,€òòet€alóó.Ô‡XXéX»¼…Ôó óÐ  p ÐÌà@@¼¼ìàò ò€Direct€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Warren€CountyÐ  p Ðà@@ôôìàNo.€9925€€€€€€Charles€D.€Ô_ÔHastonÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ  \ ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Ï` AßÐ Ð  ÐÌNo.€M2000„02126„Ô_ÔWCÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Mailed€„€September€18,€2001Ð Ë  ÐÔ#†¼…»XXXéË#ÔÔ‡XXéX»¼…ÔFiled€„€October€19,€2001Ð ·  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<Ž` AßÐ ß Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÔ‡XXéXXXXéÔThis€workersðð€compensation€appeal€has€been€referred€to€the€Special€Workersðð€CompensationÐ ŠÚ ÐAppeals€Panel€in€accordance€with€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€50„6„225(e)(3)€for€hearing€and€reporting€ofÐ vÆ Ðfindings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law.€€In€this€case,€the€employerÔ#†XXéXXXXé‰#ÔÔ#†¼…»XXXéÊ#ÔÔ‡XXéX»¼…Ô€and€its€insurer€contendÔ#†¼…»XXXé#ÔÔ‡XXéX»¼…Ô€(1)€the€trialÐ b² Ðcourt€erred€€by€referring€the€case€to€a€special€master€for€trial€of€all€issues€raised€by€the€pleadings,€(2)Ð Nž Ðthe€evidence€preponderates€against€the€special€master's€finding,€adopted€by€the€trial€court,€that€theÐ :Š Ðinjured€employee€has€a€permanent€medical€impairment€of€13€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole,€and€(3)Ð &v Ðthe€evidence€preponderates€against€the€trial€court's€award€of€permanent€partial€disability€benefitsÐ b Ðbased€on€32.5€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole.Ô#†¼…»XXXéu#ÔÔ‡XXéX»¼…Ô€€As€discussed€below,€the€panel€has€concluded€theÐ þN Ðaward€of€permanent€partial€disability€benefits€should€be€reduced€to€one€based€on€20€percent€to€theÐ ê: Ðbody€as€a€whole.Ð Ö& ÐÓ}ÓÌò òÓ  ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€50„6„225(e)€(1999)€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€CourtÐ ®þ ÐAffirmed€as€Modified.ó óÐ šê ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÓ  ÓJoe€C.€Loser,€Jr.,€Sp.€J.Ô#†¼…»àXXéï #ÔÔ‡XXéX.¼…Ôóó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòFrank€F.€Ô_ÔDrowotaÔ_Ô,€III,€J.,óó€andÐ r!  ÐòòHamilton€V.€Ô_ÔGaydenÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€Sp.€J.óó,€joined.Ð ^"®! ÐÌMary€B.€Little€and€B.€Timothy€Ô_ÔPirtleÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔMcMinnvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellants,Ð 6$†# ÐBridgestone/Firestone€and€Insurance€Company€of€the€State€of€Pennsylvania.Ð "%r $ ÐÌWilliam€Joseph€Butler€and€Frank€D.€Farrar,€Lafayette,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€Ô_ÔKaryÔ_Ô€Ray€Frazier.Ð ú&J"& ÐÌÓ» ÓÓ  Óò òMEMORANDUM€OPINIONó óÔ#†¼…»XXXé #ÔÔ‡XXéX»¼…ÔÐ Ò("$( ÐÌÓ  ÓÔ#†¼…»XXXé#ÔÔ€XXéX»¼…Ôà  àThe€employee€or€claimant,€Ô_ÔKaryÔ_Ô€Ray€Frazier,€is€34€years€old€and€a€high€school€graduate€withÐ ª*ú%* Ðexperience€as€a€laborer.€€On€March€20,€1997,€while€working€for€the€employer,€Bridgestone/Firestone,Ð –+æ&+ Ðhe€felt€a€sudden€pain€in€his€left€shoulder.€€At€the€time€of€the€injury,€he€was€reaching€out€at€shoulderÐ ‚,Ò', Ðlevel€to€spin€heavy€tires€to€position€them€properly€for€branding.€€He€was€surgically€treated€by€Dr.Ð n-¾(-ýÏ ÐÔ_ÔDavid€Bratton€and€Dr.€Wills€Oglesby,€but€has€seen€a€number€of€doctors€for€treatment€or€evaluation.Ð ° ÐÌà  àAlthough€Dr.€Bratton€released€a€ligament€and€removed€a€bone€and€bursa€from€the€injuredÐ ˆØ Ðshoulder,€he€found€no€basis€for€a€permanent€impairment€rating,€based€on€passive€range€of€motionÐ tÄ Ðtesting.€€He€conceded€that€he€did€not€use€AMA€guidelines.€€Dr.€Oglesby€later€performed€openÐ `° Ðreconstructive€surgery€to€relieve€pain€and€looseness€in€the€injured€shoulder.€€Dr.€Oglesby€assignedÐ L œ Ðan€impairment€rating€of€6€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole,€based€on€loss€of€motion,€also€using€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðpassive€test.€€He€conceded€the€AMA€guidelines€favor€active€range€of€motion€testing,€where€theÐ $ t Ðpatient€moves€the€limb€as€far€as€his€condition€will€allow.€€In€passive€testing,€the€doctor€moves€theÐ  ` Ðlimb.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àDr.€Calvin€Robinson€Dyer,€another€orthopedic€surgeon,€evaluated€the€claimant.€€Dr.€DyerÐ Ô$  Ðestimated€the€claimant's€permanent€impairment€at€16.2€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole€and€opinedÐ À  Ðthe€injury€was€causally€related€to€the€work€the€claimant€was€performing€when€he€felt€the€sudden€pain.€Ð ¬ü  ÐDr.€Dyer€also€prescribed€permanent€restrictions€on€the€use€of€the€injured€shoulder.€€Dr.€Dyer€ððsÐ ˜è  Ðopinion€was€discredited€on€cross€examination€as€inconsistent€with€the€approved€guidelines.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àDr.€Sammy€Mac€Smith€evaluated€the€claimant€and€estimated€his€permanent€medicalÐ \¬ Ðimpairment€at€12€percent€to€the€whole€body.€€Dr.€Smith's€rating€was€based€on€AMA€guidelines.€€Dr.Ð H˜ ÐJames€Talmadge,€to€whom€the€claimant€was€also€referred€for€the€purpose€of€evaluation,€assigned€aÐ 4„ Ðpermanent€whole€person€impairment€rating€of€4€percent,€also€using€AMA€guidelines.€€The€employeeÐ  p Ðhas€returned€to€work€at€the€same€or€greater€wage.Ð  \ ÐÌà  àMr.€Frazier€initiated€this€civil€action€to€recover€workers'€compensation€benefits€for€a€work„Ð ä4 Ðrelated€injury.€€The€defendants€answered€by€denying€all€the€material€allegations€of€the€complaint.€Ð Ð  ÐAfter€hearing€and€ruling€on€preliminary€motions,€the€trial€court,€on€the€day€of€trial,€referred€the€caseÐ ¼  Ðto€a€special€master,€Richard€McGregor,€for€the€purpose€of€taking€proof€and€submitting€findings€ofÐ ¨ø Ðfact€and€conclusions€of€law€as€to€all€issues.€€The€special€master€conducted€hearings€and€madeÐ ”ä Ðfindings€and€conclusions.€€The€trial€court,€after€careful€consideration€of€the€record,€adopted€theÐ €Ð Ðfindings€and€conclusions€of€the€special€master€awarding€permanent€partial€disability€benefits€basedÐ l¼ Ðon€32.5€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole.€€There€is€a€dispute€as€to€whether€the€employer€and€its€insurerÐ X ¨ Ðobjected€to€the€reference€to€a€special€master.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àThe€employer€insists€the€reference€of€the€case€to€a€special€master€was€error€because€of€theÐ #l! Ðholding€in€òòFerrell€v.€Cigna€Property€&€Casualty€Ins.€Co.óó,€33€S.W.3d€731€(Tenn.€2000),€wherein€theÐ $X" ÐSupreme€Court€held€it€was€improper€to€create€a€ð ðstanding€order€appointing€a€clerk€and€master€asÐ ô$D # Ðspecial/substitute€judge€to€hear€an€entire€class€of€cases.ðð€€òòFerrellóó,€at€739.€€By€footnote,€the€òòFerrellóóÐ à%0!$ Ðcourt€said€cases€should€be€referred€to€a€special€master€on€a€case€by€case€basis.€€That€case€did€notÐ Ì&"% Ðaddress€the€appellantsðð€next€insistence,€that€the€reference€in€the€present€case€was€not€proper€becauseÐ ¸'#& Ðit€referred€the€main€issues€in€controversy€to€the€special€master.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àBy€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€53,€a€court€may€submit€any€matter€to€a€special€master.€€Case€law,Ð |*Ì%) Ðhowever,€both€before€and€after€the€1971€adoption€of€Rule€53,€supports€the€employerððs€contention€Ô_ÔthatÐ h+¸&* Ðsuch€referrals€are€limited€to€collateral,€subordinate,€and€incidental€issues€and€the€ascertainment€ofÐ ° Ðancillary€facts,€while€the€main€issues€in€controversy€and€the€principles€on€which€these€issues€are€toÐ œì Ðbe€adjudicated€must€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€òòÔ_ÔIngramÔ_Ô€v.€Steinóó,€126€S.W.2d€891,€892€(Tenn.Ð ˆØ ÐCt.€App.€1938);€see€also€òòArcher€v.€Archeróó,€907€S.W.2d€412,€415€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995),€(citingÐ tÄ ÐòòÔ_ÔIngramÔ_Ôóó).€€Mere€inconvenience€is€not€an€acceptable€basis€for€such€a€referral.€€òòSeeóó€òòÔ_ÔFerrellÔ_Ôóó,€33€S.W.3dÐ `° Ðat€737„38.€€In€the€present€case,€the€main€issue€in€controversy€is€the€extent€of€the€claimantððsÐ L œ Ðpermanent€disability.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àOn€those€authorities,€we€now€hold€that€referral€by€a€trial€court€to€a€special€master€for€theÐ  ` Ðpurpose€of€making€findings€and€conclusions€on€the€main€issues€in€controversy€in€a€workersððÐ ü L  Ðcompensation€case€is€prohibited.€€Findings€relative€to€those€issues€and€conclusions€on€which€theyÐ è 8  Ðare€to€be€adjudicated€must€be€determined€by€the€trial€court€and€may€not€be€referred€to€a€specialÐ Ô$  Ðmaster.€€As€in€òòÔ_ÔFerrellÔ_Ôóó,€the€error€in€this€case€is€procedural€and€does€not€require€reversal€or€affect€theÐ À  Ðfinality€of€the€trial€courtððs€judgment.€€However,€referrals€on€the€main€issues€in€the€future€may€indeedÐ ¬ü  Ðrequire€reversal€and€remand€to€the€trial€court,€if€the€issue€of€the€special€master€is€raised€in€the€courtÐ ˜è  Ðbelow.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€next€insists€the€award€of€permanent€partial€disability€benefits€on€the€basis€ofÐ \¬ Ð32.5€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole€is€excessive.€€Appellate€review€of€findings€of€fact€is€de€novoÐ H˜ Ðupon€the€record€of€the€trial€court€accompanied€by€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€findings,€unlessÐ 4„ Ðthe€preponderance€of€the€evidence€is€otherwise.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€50„6„225(e)(2).€€However,Ð  p Ðwhere€a€trial€court€adopts€the€findings€of€a€special€master,€as€the€trial€court€did€in€the€present€case,Ð  \ Ðappellate€review€is€de€novo€without€any€presumption€of€correctness.€€òòArcheróó€at€416.Ð øH ÐÌà  àDr.€Ô_ÔBrattonÔ_Ô,€Dr.€Dyer€and€Dr.€Ô_ÔOglesbyÔ_Ô€are€licensed€and€board€certified€orthopedic€surgeons,Ð Ð  Ðbut€their€opinions€in€this€case€are€questionable.€€Dr.€Ô_ÔBrattonÔ_Ô€ignored€statutory€guidelines.€€Dr.Ð ¼  ÐÔ_ÔOglesbyÔ_Ô€failed€to€use€active€range€of€motion€testing,€as€those€guidelines€require.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àDr.€Ô_ÔTalmadgeÔ_Ô,€in€addition€to€being€licensed€and€board€certified€in€orthopedic€surgery,€is€anÐ €Ð Ðassociate€editor€of€the€AMA€guidelines.€€Dr.€Smith€is€an€experienced€evaluator€whose€testimonyÐ l¼ Ðreflected€an€understanding€of€the€guidelines.€€We€are€persuaded€from€the€record€that€the€opinions€ofÐ X ¨ ÐDr.€Smith€and€Dr.€Ô_ÔTalmadgeÔ_Ô€should€be€considered€and€given€equal€weight.€€The€result€is€that€theÐ D!” Ðevidence€fairly€reflects€a€permanent€whole€body€medical€impairment€of€8€percent.Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àBecause€the€schedule€of€benefits€contained€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô‡XXéXXXXéÔ50„6„207(3)(A)(ii)Ô#†XXéXXXXé¨0#Ô€doesÐ $X" Ðnot€include€shoulder€injuries,€the€claimant€is€entitled€to€benefits€based€on€a€percentage€of€disabilityÐ ô$D # Ðto€the€body€as€a€whole.€òòSeeóó€òòÔ‡XXéXXXXéÔÔ_ÔAdvoÔ_Ô,€Inc.€v.€Phillipsóó,€989€S.W.2d€693€(Tenn.€1998).Ô#†XXéXXXXé·1#Ô€€Ô‡XXéXXXXéÔFor€injuries€arisingÐ à%0!$ Ðafter€August€1,€1992,€in€cases€where€an€injured€worker€is€entitled€to€permanent€partial€disabilityÐ Ì&"% Ðbenefits€to€the€body€as€a€whole€and€the€pre„injury€employer€returns€the€employee€to€employment€atÐ ¸'#& Ða€wage€equal€to€or€greater€than€the€wage€the€employee€was€receiving€at€the€time€of€the€injury,€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðmaximum€permanent€partial€disability€award€the€employee€may€receive€is€two€and€one„half€timesÐ )à$( Ðthe€medical€impairment€rating€pursuant€to€the€provisions€of€the€òòAmerican€Medical€AssociationÐ |*Ì%) ÐGuides€to€the€Evaluation€of€Permanent€Impairmentóó€or€the€òòManual€foróó€òòOrthopedic€Surgeons€inÐ h+¸&* ÐEvaluating€Permanent€Physical€Impairmentóó.€€In€making€determinations,€the€trial€courts€are€toÐ ° Ðconsider€all€pertinent€factors,€including€lay€and€expert€testimony,€the€employeeððs€age,€education,Ð œì Ðskills€and€training,€local€job€opportunities€for€the€disabled,€and€capacity€to€work€at€types€ofÐ ˆØ Ðemployment€available€in€the€claimantððs€disabled€condition.€€Ô#†XXéXXXXéR2#ÔÔ‡XXéXXXXéÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€50„6„241(a)(1).Ô#†XXéXXXXé"7#ÔÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àFrom€a€consideration€of€the€pertinent€factors,€to€the€extent€they€were€established€by€the€proofÐ L œ Ðbefore€the€special€master,€the€panel€is€persuaded€that€the€evidence€preponderates€in€favor€of€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðmaximum€allowable€award€of€two€and€one„half€times€the€medical€impairment€rating,€or€20€percentÐ $ t Ðto€the€body€as€a€whole,€and€against€an€award€based€on€32.5€percent€to€the€body€as€a€whole.€€TheÐ  ` Ðjudgment€is€modified€accordingly.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àAs€modified,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€are€taxed€to€the€appellants.Ð Ô$  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ˜è  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€C.€LOSER,€JR.Ð  „Ô  ÐÔ‡¼…»XXXéÔÓ  Óà@@7 7 ìàIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEÐ ° ÐSPECIAL€WORKERSðð€COMPENSATION€APPEALS€PANELÐ Â ÐÌÔ#†XXéX»¼…9;#ÔÌò òÔ‡¼…»XXXéÔÔ_ÔKARYÔ_Ô€RAY€FRAZIERòòóó€v.€BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE,€INC.,€òòet€alóó.Ô#†XXéX»¼…<#Ôó óÐ Ò" ÐÌà@@¼¼ìàò òCircuit€Court€for€Warren€CountyÐ Ò " Ðà@@ôôìàNo.€9925Ð ¾  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‚Ò  ÐÌNo.€M2000„02126„Ô_ÔWCÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€„€October€19,€2001Ð }Í  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<T` AßÐ U¥  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÔ‡¼…»XXXéÔÔ#†XXéX»¼…“>#ÔÌÌÓ‡>ÓÓ  Óò òJUDGMENTó óÔ‡¼…»XXXéÔÔ#†XXéX»¼…?#ÔÐ (x ÐÌÓ  ÓÔ‡¼…»XXXéÔÔ#†XXéX»¼…e?#ÔÔ‡XXéXXXXéÔà  àThis€case€is€before€the€Court€upon€the€entire€record,€including€the€order€of€referral€to€theÐ P ÐSpecial€Workersðð€Compensation€Appeals€Panel,€and€the€Panelððs€Memorandum€Opinion€setting€forthÐ ì< Ðits€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law,€which€are€incorporated€herein€by€reference.Ð Ø( ÐÌà  àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€Memorandum€Opinion€of€the€Panel€should€beÐ ° Ðaccepted€and€approved;€andÐ œì ÐÌà  àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panelððs€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law€are€adoptedÐ tÄ Ðand€affirmed,€and€the€decision€of€the€Panel€is€made€the€judgment€of€the€Court.Ð `° ÐÌà  àCosts€will€be€paid€by€the€appellants,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ð 8ˆ ÐÌà  àIT€IS€SO€ORDERED.Ð !`  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àPER€Ô_ÔCURIAMÔ_ÔÐ À$ $ Ðà  àÔ#†XXéXXXXé§?#Ô