WPC 9%6vFv(Ev:awkH|@g#us&B<qmPfRē|7/tT+wWdkxAjElsNRa'["Ifx}e799L7FJjm91  m/L"Dr' )2I2DƳhe5(eE<I!TpT(+PI);Ǟ%vA?K /ArPhhF4pziTjG{.ň㎉~5)Xd+Ø C~䫔Ut'OsJiFAOdvl6pj(ްs䵣` d4MbV*w.sG2 "s g=1/7~eub#\UN %k 0(q U : w 4   0l 0D, Np ^ r ~ m U,    W N zUNkE Bb 0 D3 D- 0K AS/ 0H 0D A0HP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,cAZ"Arial RegularK(3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5((3$ !      0  (#$  0  B-) U,cAZArial  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt("  Z6Times New Roman Regular d- -(|3$ !.8dd8     'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8dd8     ($$   1   X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !  _TR[A' LegalX3' Letter A' Legal3'TXXXX8pXXdd8@  @@ INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE  @ SPECIALWORKERSCOMPENSATIONAPPEALSPANEL  @*ATKNOXVILLE   JOHNNYL.FRYE,0   X      ` )`%%  P     X      ` )  _McMINN_ԀCIRCUIT F   P Plaintiff/Appellant X      ` ) , |  P     X      ` )  NO.03S019904CV00043  b v. P     X      ` )  H  P     X      ` )  .  ATHENSPRODUCTS,0 X 0X%X%  ) ` HON.JOHNB._HAGLER_  %%  P     X      ` )      P Defendant/Appellee0     ` ) %%  P     X      ` FILED:SEPTEMBER13,_2000_ \   P FortheAppellant:   X     FortheAppellee:   RobertS.Thompson X     DonaldB.Reid  Logan,Thompson,Miller,_Bilbo_    10WestMadisonAvenue ~ ЀThompson,&Fisher,P.C.    P.O.Box628 d 30SecondStreet   X     Athens,TN373710628 J Cleveland,TN373640191     `      h  0   MEMORANDUMOPINION F$# MembersofPanel:  (2$( JusticeWilliamM.Barker *&* SeniorJudgeJohnK.Byers +&+ SpecialJudgeHowellN.Peoples ,',   AFFIRMED    X      `   BYERS,SeniorJudge  9J5; 8pXXdXXd8 P  Thisworkers'compensationappealhasbeenreferredtotheSpecial  Workers'CompensationAppealsPaneloftheSupremeCourtinaccordancewith | TennesseeCodeAnnotated506225(e)(3)forhearingandreportingtothe H SupremeCourtoffindingsoffactandconclusionsoflaw.  d  P Reviewofthefindingsoffactmadebythetrialcourtisdenovouponthe  0 recordofthetrialcourt,accompaniedbyapresumptionofthecorrectnessofthe   finding,unlessthepreponderanceoftheevidenceisotherwise.Tenn.CodeAnn. |  506225(e)(2);Stonev.Cityof_McMinnville_,896S.W.2d548,550(Tenn.1995). H   P TheapplicationofthisstandardrequiresthisCourttoweighinmoredepth h thefactualfindingsandconclusionsofthetrialcourtsinworkerscompensation 4 cases.SeeCorcoranv.FosterAuto_GMC_,Inc.,746S.W.2d452,456(Tenn.  1988).    P Theplaintiffappealsfromthetrialcourtfindingthathehadfailedtoshowby L apreponderanceoftheevidencethathehadsustainedaninjuryarisingoutofand h inthecourseofhiswork. 4  P Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.    P Thereislittleneedtogointosignificantdetailconcerningthefactsinthis |!  case.Therearesignificantdiscrepanciesbetweenthetestimonyoftheplaintiffat H#" trialandinthestatementshemadetomedicalprovidersconcerningwhetherhe %d $ sustainedaninjuryonJune1,1998,orwhetherheexperiencedpainontheprior &0"& Sundaywhilewalkinginthemall,orwhetherhesustainedaninjuryatworkonJune (#( 2nd.Theplaintiffgavetheonlyevidenceconcerninganallegedaccidentalinjury. x*%*  P Thedeterminationofthetrialjudgewas,bynecessity,baseduponhis D,', assessmentoftheevidenceandhisrulingbaseduponthetestimonyoftheplaintiff. .`).   P  Thetrialcourtfoundthattheplaintiffdidnottellthedefendantofanywork /,+0 relatedaccidentuntilJune28thbutfoundthathedidnotifythephysicianand 1,2 especiallythenursepractitioneronJune2ndthathesustainedaworkrelatedinjury t3.4 onJune1.Thecourtfoundthisunusualandruledthatthetwohistoriescancelled @506 outeachother,thuscausingtheplaintifftofailincarryinghisburdenofproof.   7\28  P  8(4: Ї P WeaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtandtaxXXXXԀthecostsoftheappealto  theplaintiff. |  P 3XX8 #XX3#  X X  #XXXX`# P     X     򀀀 . ~  P     X     JohnK.Byers,SeniorJudge  J CONCUR:    ̀ ^  WilliamM.Barker,Justice D  ̀  HowellN.Peoples,SpecialJudge   3XX8XXdXXd8   @ #XX3#ަ XXINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE  @*ATKNOXVILLE  _#XX ަ#_ 3XX  JOHNNYL.FRYEv.ATHENSPRODUCT#XX3V#  " u@0 @0A) ` dE ` A߈   @I I No.E199901435_WC_ԄR3CVFiledSeptember13,2000   A) ` dE ` A     __@._ ORDER _Ԉ   ____ P  ThiscaseisbeforetheCourtuponmotionforreviewpursuantto n  Tenn.CodeAnn.506225(e)(5)(B),theentirerecord,includingtheorderof T referraltotheSpecialWorkers'CompensationAppealsPanel,andthePanel's : MemorandumOpinionsettingforthitsfindingsoffactandconclusionsoflaw,which   areincorporatedhereinbyreference;   P  Whereupon,itappearstotheCourtthatthemotionforreviewisnot  welltakenandshouldbedismissedand   P  Itis,therefore,orderedthatthePanel'sfindingsoffactand h conclusionsoflawareadoptedandaffirmed,andthedecisionofthePanelismade N thejudgmentoftheCourt.  4   P  Costsonappealaretaxedtotheplaintiff. j  P  ITISSOORDEREDthis13thdayofSeptember,_2000._ 6  P     X     PER_CURIAM_  Barker,J.Notparticipating.XXXX   P     X      ` #XXXX%# P H