WPC) ÀD/ٰe`Yn99S_VZj2*e)(S~dZ} .tzCsTEy?AHDZ%#9'WQ7)xh5{eb-ES 8U 񁕜U3|t"v ^\QUw"c&&ƌQˏsy$ K'=[gް\=ޢdPs]Bv",PIN-J͏NfdΦ0LC"[wLj#ƍJ.CuάeQPn|exct5FJ`yw |bh-ipBjWԥdIff - u .ZC}7Uܞ=^ "{TWNDW!p^cFOgύR5qHb\ 0n 0n 0nv 0n 0nR 0n 0n. 0B 0_ 0>= 0{ U1* 0 0j 0N<    Wn[ 0! D+ Aw CxN 0I 0( AM7 zUNE 0  B# 03#U N % M ( N!^ !w!4 !4! m6! 0DM!UN!!!!!!!!!!!!d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ D3G'G'G'G' ASz''' 0D( A(\  `&Times New Roman<:Default Par6XXX<:Default Par5XXX<:Default Par4XXX<:Default Par3XXX<:Default Par2XXX<:Default Par1XXX<:Default ParaXXX<:WP9_Emphasis<:WP9_Hyperlin    86WP9_Strong <cw :WP9_Body Tex  ? %2A`Arial?  XXXS\  `&Times New RomanS%2A`Arial< :Body Text In  OS  ? %2A`Arial?  A7p x (08 "(#A  nd X` hp x (#nXXXS\  `&Times New RomanS  OS  : 8Body Text 2  HS? %2A`Arial?    XXXS\  `&Times New RomanS  HS(O$SEGH_OPINION7422-2clsccl1Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5clsccl2Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 M ($..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn    1    _ X3XXXnThoughnomotionsforsanctionsweresoughtbytheplaintiffappellee.#XnXX X3#  ($..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn    4    _ X3XXXnOuropinionshouldnotbereadasignoringthefactthatBowmanhadfailedto  complywithdiscoveryandwascarelessinnotkeepingintouchwithhislawyerandthat  Bowmanfailedtotakeaffirmativestepstoresolvetheconflict.However,Bowmantried  toresolvethesituationbyretainingservicesofthreeattorneys.RecognizingBowmans h lessthandiligentaction,weareneverthelessconstrainedbythebasicrequirementsof N dueprocesstoaffordeveryone,evenBowman,anopportunitytodefendthemselvesin 4 ~ court.#XnXX X3#ԅLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(2na$ ,\!..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn  'dxdo&"D&raw Object Text <C HKKKKdd(2na$ ,\!..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn  ݁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5($ !A<< c$C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt("  Z6Times New Roman Regular((3$ ,\!..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn      0     d#|x(r\$..      .X~XX.XX~XX.X~HP LJ 4000/4050 PCL 5e,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular.X+ Ai*<R~1.200tU(+$  4  (9 Z 6Times New Roman Regular  ($..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn    3    _ X3XXXnԀBowmanlatertestifiedthatheneverreceivedthenoticeandfurtherclaimed  thathedidnotknowthatOfficernolongerrepresentedhim.#XnXX X3# X3XXXnMoreover,Bowmans  testimony,whichwasonlycontradictedbytheevidentiaryinferencethataletterproperly  mailedisreceivedbytheaddressee,wasthathewasnotawareoftheSeptember5, h 2000trialdate.#XnXX X3# Z ($..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn    2    _ X3XXXnHalfacre,whooriginallyrepresentedBowman,filedamotioninSeptember1997  towithdrawasacounselforBowman,statinginhisaffidavitthathisrequeststo  BowmantorespondtoMeltonsinterrogatorieswentunanswered.TheTrialCourt  grantedHalfacreleavetowithdraw.#XnXX X3#****'dxd^`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1   !&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK ,\!..      .XnXX.XXnXX.Xn  _        %  %FXXn dF INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE ~ SPECIALWORKERSCOMPENSATIONPANELATNASHVILLE  JUNE2001SESSION       WILLISLEE_MELTON_Ԁv.BUTCHBOWMAN,d/b/aBowmans   TrailerTransportandRepair       DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtofOvertonCounty  (  No.3108,Hon.JohnJ.MadduxJr.,Judge 4  ___________________________________ @  No.M200002960WCR3CVMailedJuly17,2001 X  FiledAugust20,2001 d     d d d d            ThisworkerscompensationappealhasbeenreferredtotheSpecial 2| WorkersCompensationAppealsPanelinaccordancewiththeTenn.Code > Ann.506225(e)(3)forhearingandreportingfindingsoffactand J conclusionsoflaw.Theissueonappealpresentedbyemployer/appellant V iswhetherthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretionin%  %Urefusingtograntthe b appellantsmotionpursuanttoRule60.02(1)(5)oftheTenn.R.Civ.P.The n panelhasconcludedthatthejudgmentofthetrialcourtshouldbereversed z becausethenoticerequirementofdueprocesswasnotsatisfied.  ݌  Ќ   d d d d  Tenn.CodeAnn.506225(e)(3)AppealasofRight;Judgmentofthe  CircuitCourtReversed.   FrankG.Clement,Jr.,Sp.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhich !  FrankF.Drowota,III,J.,andBenH._Cantrell_,_Sp.J._,joined. " DarylA.Colson,Livingston,Tennessee,fortheappellant/employerButch $0  Bowman,d/b/aBowmansTrailerTransportandRepair. %