ÿWPCÙ$ Æ# ä UNï %= 0ûC U:>4xŒÆ›aw@i 0?© 0DèÆ,ÆòƸÆ~ 0DD 0Jˆ 0TÒ 0^& 0h„ 0rì 0|^ BÚ 0†÷ 0} 1u  0d‚ D3æ 0@ 0KYU >¤U*âU* v~6vÓ´ D+‡" AO²" 0D# D/E# Bt# AY‘# 0Fê# A©0$˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX(ÓH=$¡¡Ñ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑÔ€XÎ_XXXÔÑ7€¾úXXdðXXdð7Ñ, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular­M³$3|x>Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 >U >D >P >D >D >>D>>>D(ï(3v$¤¤Ý ƒH=!ÝÑ  ÑÒH°ÒÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XX’XXXÔÑ7€eXXdìdì7ÑÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$©©Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô d2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô !"#%& ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ$$$$'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Arial< Œ 9p`(TimesPtPtHHØ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva Ò'ÈÈÈÈdxd-‚ƒCþÿ<< Cÿÿ($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd-¸:Müÿ << deUU(n$––ò ò(Ú  Ú1Ú  Ú)ó ó -.:›&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€2ÔÑ  ÑÒ  ÒÒ H ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÔ€3ÔÑ#€44Xd#ÑÑ#€44Xd#ÑÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÓ  ÓÔ€2ÔÔ€2¼Ô›Þ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àSPECIAL€WORKERS'€COMPENSATION€APPEALS€PANELÌà@ àAT€KNOXVILLEó óÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌWILLIAM€H.€STAGNOLIA,€JR.,à à)à àÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àPlaintiff/Appellantà àà à)à àCAMPBELL€CHANCERYÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌv.à àà àà àà àà àà à)à àNO.Ô€3Ô€Ô€2Ôœ03S01›„9706„CH„00062Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌLINCOLN€BRASS€WORKS,€INC.,à à)à àHON.€BILLY€JOE€WHITE,Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àCHANCELLORÌà àDefendant/Appelleeà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìv.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌDINA€TOBIN,€Director€and€Trustee,à à)ÌSecond€Injury€Fund,€State€ofà àà à)ÌTennessee,à àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àCross„Defendant/Appelleeà à)ÌÌÌò òòòFor€the€Appellantà àà àFor€the€Appelleeà àà àFor€theÏAppelleeóóó óÌò òòòWilliam€H.€œStagnolia›,€Jr.:à àLincoln€Brass€Works:à àSecond€InjuryÏœFund:€›óóó óGary€W.€œFerraris›à àà àà àJanet€L.€Hoganà àà àJohnÏKnox€WalkupÌ2111€First€Tennessee€Plazaà àHOGAN€&€HOGANà àAtty.€Gen.€&ÏReporterÌ800€S.€Gay€Streetà àà àà à620€W.€Hill€Ave.à àà àÌP.€O.€Box€259à àà àà àKnoxville,€TN€37902à àSandra€E.€KeithÌKnoxville,€TN€37901„0259à àà àà àà àà àœAsst›.€Atty.€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àœCordell›€Hull€œBldg›.ÌÒ  ÒÒ u Òà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€ÌÒ  ÒÒ ì Òà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à37243„Ï0499ÌÌÓ  Óò òòòÔ€2 ÔM€E€M€O€R€A€N€D€U€M€€€O€P€I€N€I€O€NÌÔ€2¼ÔÌMembers€of€Panel:ÌÌó óóóJustice€œAdolpho›€A.€Birch,€Jr.ÌSenior€Judge€William€H.€InmanÌSpecial€Judge€Roger€E.€ThayerÌÓ  ÓÌÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDà àà àà àà àà àà àINMAN,€Senior€JudgeÌÌÓÓà àThis€workers'€compensation€appeal€has€been€referred€to€the€SpecialÏWorkers'€Compensation€Appeals€Panel€of€the€Supreme€Court€inÏaccordance€with€œT.C.A.›€ðð€50„6„225(e)(3)€for€hearing€and€reporting€to€theÏSupreme€Court€of€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law.à àÌà àPlaintiff€filed€suit€in€1989€for€work„related€injury€to€his€œleft€hand›Ïand€alleged€œa€related›€psychiatric€disability.€€By€final€judgment€enteredÏSeptember€5,€1991,€the€trial€court€awarded€accrued€and€future€œmedicalÏand€psychiatric›€benefits€and€permanent€partial€disability€to€his€hand€butÏfound€he€had€failed€to€prove€any€permanent€psychiatric€disability.€€€TheÏjudgment€was€not€appealed.Ìà àOn€January€20,€1995,€plaintiff€filed€this€suit€alleging€that€(1)€underÏT.C.A.€ðð€50„6„231€he€was€entitled€to€modification€of€the€1991€finalÏjudgment€due€to€increased€psychiatric€impairment,€or€(2)€in€theÏalternative,€he€was€entitled€to€benefits€for€a€new€accidental€[psychiatric]Ïinjury€which€occurred€on€September€œ2,€1994.›€€Ìà àThe€trial€court€found€that€plaintiff€had€failed€to€prove€that€he€gaveÏtimely€notice€œto€the€employer€of›€a€new€work„related€œaccident,›€had€failed€toÏprove€a€new€compensable€injury,€and€was€barred€from€reopening€theÏprior€case€for€modification€of€the€award€owing€to€the€doctrine€of€òòresÏjudicata€óóand€the€statute€of€limitations,€since€the€denial€of€permanentÏpsychiatric€disability€in€that€case€was€never€appealed.Ìà à€€The€plaintiff€appeals,€insisting€that€notice€of€a€new€injury€wasÏprovided€to€the€defendant€in€a€letter€to€the€employer€from€his€doctor€andÏby€comments€made€by€the€plaintiff€at€work,€and€that€a€particular€stressfulÏincident€at€work€was€a€sufficient€mental€stimulus€to€constitute€a€newÏpsychiatric€injury.€€Defendant€insists€the€trial€judge€correctly€decidedÏthose€issues€and€correctly€held€that€the€denial€of€permanent€psychiatricÏdisability€in€1991€was€not€subject€to€œreopening,€and›€also€argues€forÏtermination€or€limitation€of€its€liability€for€continuing€psychiatric€careÏunder€the€first€judgment,€contending€that€the€medical€experts€cannotÏdifferentiate€between€work„related€and€non„work„related€symptoms.Ìà àWe€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ìà àReview€of€the€findings€of€fact€made€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóóÏupon€the€record€of€the€trial€court,€accompanied€by€a€presumption€of€theÏcorrectness€of€the€finding,€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€isÏotherwise.€€€T.C.A.€ðð€€50„6„225(e)(2);€òòStone€v.€City€of€œMcMinnville›,€óó896ÍS.W.2d€548,€550€(Tenn.€1995).Ô€3ÔÔ€3XÔ€Ô€2ÔÔ€2¼Ô€The€application€of€this€standard€requiresÏthis€Court€to€weigh€in€more€depth€the€factual€findings€and€conclusions€ofÏthe€trial€courts€in€workersðð€compensation€cases.€€òòSee€œCorcoran›€v.€FosterÏAuto€œGMC›,€Inc.,€óó746€S.W.2d€452,€456€(Tenn.€1988).Ô€3ÔÔ€3XÔÌÔ€2ÔÔ€2¼Ôà àIn€1989€plaintiff€lost€four€fingers€of€his€left€hand€at€work€when€aÏmachine€malfunctioned€and€cut€them€off.€€He€received€medical€care€for€theÏhand€and€psychiatric€treatment€for€post„traumatic€stress.€€When€heÏreturned€to€work€he€was€transferred€to€the€Maintenance€Department,Ïwhere€he€worked€on€machinery€only€when€it€was€œinoperative.›€€He€was€œa›Ïœtrainee,›€œbut›€after€four€yearsðð€training,€œwas›€not€promoted€to€a€permanentÏmaintenance€job€because€he€had€failed€to€develop€the€necessary€skills.€€Ìà àIn€September€1994€the€employer€transferred€him€back€to€operatingÏmachinery.€€He€worked€for€one€and€one„half€hours,€became€upset,€told€aÏmanager€that€he€could€not€return€to€working€on€machinery€because€itÏterrified€him,€and€left.€€€He€went€to€his€psychiatrist,€Dr.€Robert€Demers,Ïwho€sent€a€letter€to€the€employer€on€September€13,€1994€which€advised:ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àð ðIt€has€come€to€my€attention€that€Mr.€Stagnolia€has€beenÏrequired€to€resume€operating€machinery€at€Lincoln€Brass€andÏthis€has€caused€a€resumption€of€symptoms€of€anxiety€andÏdepression€initially€brought€on€by€his€on„the„job€injury€on€aÏpress€at€Lincoln€Brass.€€Therefore,€he€should€immediately€beÏtaken€off€such€machinery€and€resume€his€maintenanceÏposition.€€If€this€is€not€possible,€then€he€should€be€placed€onÏworkmanððs€compensation.ððÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà àSince€the€plaintiff€had€already€demonstrated€an€inability€to€performÏthe€maintenance€job,€he€was€offered€a€job€as€janitor,€which€he€refused.€Ìà àDr.€Demers€diagnosed€post„traumatic€stress€disorder,€exacerbatedÏby€the€stress€of€returning€to€the€work€of€machine€operator.€€He€opined€thatÏplaintiffððs€job€transfer€was€the€event€that€resulted€in€permanentÏpsychological€impairment,€and€that€plaintiff€has€moderate€impairment€ofÏhis€ability€to€concentrate,€adapt,€function€socially,€and€perform€dailyÏactivities.€€He€assessed€45€„€50€percent€permanent€partial€impairment.Ìà àDr.€Ben€œBurston›,€independent€medical€examiner,€diagnosed€post„traumatic€stress€disorder€and€adjustment€disorder€with€depressed€mood.€ÏHe€assessed€15€percent€impairment.€€Significantly,€he€opined€that€theÏpermanent€psychiatric€impairment€arose€when€plaintiff€first€injured€hisÏhand€in€1989,€and€that€the€job„change€incident€was€merely€œa€temporary›Ïexacerbation€of€that€impairment.€€Ìà àThe€trial€court€held€that€Dr.€Demersðð€letter€to€the€employer€and€theÏemployeeððs€statement€to€a€manager€that€he€could€not€work€on€machineryÏwere€not€sufficient€notice€of€a€claim€for€a€new€workersðð€compensationÏinjury.Ìà àT.C.A.€ðð€50„6„201€œprovides›€that€in€order€to€receive€workersððÏcompensation€benefits,€an€employee€must€give€notice€of€an€injury€to€theÏemployer€within€30€days€after€sustaining€the€injury.€òòœAetna›€Casualty€&ÍSurety€Co.€V.€Long,€óó569€S.W.2d€444€(Tenn.€1978).€€Notice€must€beÏcalculated€reasonably€to€convey€the€message€that€the€employee€has€sufferedÏan€injury€arising€out€of€and€in€the€course€of€employment.€€òòMasters€v.ÏIndustrial€Garments€œMfg›.€Co.,€Inc.,€óó595€S.W.2d€811€(Tenn.€1980).€ÏAlthough€the€plaintiff€told€a€manager€that€he€could€not€work€onÏmachinery,€he€did€not€œinform€the€employer›€that€he€had€sustained€a€newÏwork„related€accidental€injury€or€intended€to€make€a€new€œworkersðð›Ïcompensation€claim.€€òòSee€International€Playing€Card€v.€œBroyles›,€óó381€ÏS.W.2d€888€(Tenn.€1964).€€Therefore,€we€find€the€trial€court€properlyÏdismissed€plaintiffððs€claim€for€benefits€for€a€new€psychiatric€œinjury€forÏfailure€of€the€employee€to€provide€timely€notice.›Ìà àPlaintiff€contends€in€the€alternative€that€he€is€entitled€to€modificationÏof€his€prior€award€for€increase€in€disability€under€T.C.A.€ðð€50„6„231,Ïwhich€provides:ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àà àð ð(2)€If€the€parties€cannot€agree,€then€at€any€time€afterÏsix€(6)€months€from€the€date€of€the€award€an€application€mayÏbe€made€to€the€courts€by€either€party,€on€the€ground€ofÏincrease€or€decrease€of€incapacity€due€solely€to€the€injury.ððÌÌÓ  ÓÓÓà àThe€trial€court€held€this€issue€was€òòres€judicata,óó€reasoning€that€noÏaward€Ìfor€psychiatric€disability€was€made€in€the€first€œsuit,€the›€judgment€was€notÏappealed,€and€œit€had›€been€fully€paid€prior€to€the€filing€of€œthe€newÍcomplaint.›€€We€agree.€€When€an€award€for€workersðð€compensationÏbenefits€has€been€paid€in€full,€either€by€lump€sum€or€because€all€periodicÏpayments€have€been€made,€the€award€is€not€subject€to€modification€underÏT.C.A.€ðð€50„6„231.€€òòUnderwood€v.€Zurich€œInsur›.€Co.,€óó854€S.W.2d€94Ï(Tenn.€1993);€òòœBritton›€v.€Combustion€Engineering,€Inc.,€óóNO.€œ03S01›„9409„CH„00080€[Sp.€Workersðð€œComp›.€Panel,€Knoxville,€3/17/95,€adopted€andÏaffirmed€per€curiam.]€Ìà àFinally,€the€employer€insists€that€medical€benefits€for€continuingÏpsychiatric€care€under€the€first€judgment€should€be€terminated€or€limitedÏbecause€the€medical€experts€cannot€differentiate€between€work„related€andÏnon„work„related€symptoms.ÓÓ€€Ìà àÌà àÓÓThe€employer€is€required€to€ð ðfurnish€free€of€charge€to€the€employeeÏsuch€medical€.€.€.€treatment€.€.€.€as€ordered€by€the€attending€physician€.€.€.Ïmade€reasonably€necessary€by€œthe€accident›€.€.€.€as€may€be€reasonablyÏœrequired;ð𛀀T.C.A.€ðð€50„6„204(a)(1);€òòWilkes€v.€Resource€Authority,€óó932ÏS.W.2d€458€(Tenn.€1996).€€€Generally€it€is€premature€for€courts€to€limitÏor€deny€medical€benefits€at€the€time€of€trial,€œ€òòRoark›€v.€Liberty€œMut›.€œIns›.ÏCo.,€óó793€S.W.2d€932€(Tenn.€1990),€since€treatment€ordered€by€physiciansÏdesignated€by€the€employer€are€presumed€to€be€necessary€and€reasonable.€œòòÏClarendon›€v.€Baptist€œMem›.€Hospital,€óó796€S.W.2d€685€(Tenn.€1990).€ò òÏó óHowever,€whether€an€employee€is€justified€in€seeking€additional€medicalÍservices€to€be€paid€by€the€employer€without€consulting€him€depends€uponÏthe€circumstances€of€each€case.€€òòœBazner›€v.€American€States€œIns›.€Co.,€óó820ÏS.W.2d€742€(Tenn.€1991).Ìà àIn€this€case,€the€medical€evidence€indicates€that€the€treatingÏphysician€has€treated€the€plaintiff€for€numerous€psychiatric€problems,Ïsome€of€which€are€work„related€and€many€of€which€are€not.€€TheÏprocedure€to€be€followed€in€these€situations€is€outlined€in€òòœBazner›,€supra,Ïóówhich€holds:ÌÓ  ÓÓÓà8 àð ð[œA]n›€employee€is€entitled€to€recover€any€reasonable€andÏnecessary€medical€expenses€in€the€future€which€are€incurredÏas€a€result€of€a€compensable€injury.€€If€and€when€applicationÏis€made€for€any€such€future€medical€expenses,€the€trial€judgeÏwill€at€that€time€and€under€the€evidence€then€adduced€have€toÏdetermine€whether€the€employer€or€its€insurance€carrier€isÏliable€for€the€payment€of€such€expenses.€.€.€.€application€madeÏfor€post„judgment€medical€expenses€should€be€made€byÏpetition€in€the€original€action€.€.€.€[and]€plaintiff€must€show€aÏdirect€causal€relationship€between€the€need€for€medicalÏtreatment€and€plaintiffððs€on„the„job€injury€.€.€.ððÌœÌÓ  ÓÓÓà àIn€accordance€with€the€holding€of€òòBazner,óó€we€hold€that€theÏemployer€shall€be€responsible€for€only€that€future€medical€care€for€whichÏthe€plaintiff€has€made€application€to€the€trial€court€and€which€has€beenÏdetermined€by€the€trial€court€to€be€directly€causally€related€to€theÏcompensable€injury€of€1989,€and€to€be€reasonable€and€necessary.Ìà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed€at€the€costs€of€theÏappellant€and€the€case€is€remanded€for€all€appropriate€purposes.Ìà àà àÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à________________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliam€H.€Inman,€Senior€JudgeÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌAdolpho€A.€Birch,€Jr.,€JusticeÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌRoger€E.€Thayer,€Special€JudgeÌà à€Ìà àÌà àÌà àÇÒ  ÒÒ ì ÒÌà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€IN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEÌà à€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà à€à à€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àAT€KNOXVILLEà àà àÌÌÌÒ Ê ÒÒ ì Òà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÒ S ÒÒ ì Òà àà àWILLIAM€H.€STAGNOLIA,€JR.à à)à àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àà àà à€€€€à àÏà àà àPlaintiff/Appellantà àà àà à)€€€CAMPBELL€CHANCERYÌ€€€à à€€€à à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€No.€€13,770à àà àà àà à€à àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€ÏHon€Billy€Joe€Whiteà àà àà à€€€€€€€€€€à àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€ÏChancellorà àà àà à€€€€€€LINCOLN€BRASS€WORKS,€INC.€€€€€)à àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€ÏNo.€03S01„9706„CV„00062Ìà àDefendant/Appelleeà àà à)à àà àÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌvs.à àà àà à€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌDINA€TOBIN,€Director€and€Trustee,à à)ÌSecond€Injury€fund,€State€of€Tenn.à à)Ìà àCross„Defendant/Appelleà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà à€€€€JUDGMENT€ORDERÌà àà àà àÌà à€€€€€€€€€€€ÓfæÓÓ ø ÓÓ` Ü…X ì–XÓThis€case€is€before€the€Court€upon€the€entire€record,Ïincluding€the€order€of€referral€to€the€Special€Workersðð€CompensationÏPanel,€and€the€Panelððs€Memorandum€Opinion€setting€forth€its€findings€ofÏfact€and€conclusions€of€law,€which€are€incorporated€herein€by€reference;Ìà àà àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€MemorandumÏOpinion€of€the€Panel€should€be€accepted€and€approved;€andÌà àà àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panelððs€findings€of€fact€andÏconclusions€of€law€are€adopted€and€affirmed,€and€the€decision€of€theÍPanel€is€made€the€Judgment€of€the€Court.€Ïà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÒ  ÒÒ ì ÒCosts€on€appeal€are€taxed€to€theÏplaintiff/appellant,€William€H.€Stagnolia,€Jr.,€and€Gary€W.€Ferraris,Ïsurety€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ì06/02/98Ì€ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÙ€Ù<<€Conversion€error€>>à àà àThis€case€is€before€the€Court€upon€motionÏfor€review€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann€.ðð€50„6„225€(e)€(5)€(B),€theÏentire€record,€including€the€order€of€referral€to€the€Special€WorkersððÏCompensation€Appeals€Panel,€and€the€Panelððs€Memorandum€OpinionÏsetting€forth€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusions€of€law,€which€areÏincorporated€herein€by€reference;Ìà àà àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€motion€forÏreview€is€not€well€taken€and€should€be€denied;€andÌà àà àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panelððs€findings€of€fact€andÏconclusions€of€law€are€adopted€and€affirmed,€and€the€decision€of€theÏPanel€is€made€the€judgment€of€the€Court.Ìà àà àCosts€will€be€paid€by€the€plaintiff„appellant€and€sureties,€forÏwhich€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ìà àà àIT€IS€SO€ORDERED€this€____€day€of€June,€1997.ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àPER€CURIAMÌÌAnderson,€J.€„€Not€ParticipatingÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌal€to€the€Special€Workerðð€Compensation€Panel,€and€the€PanelððsÏMemorandum€Opinion€setting€forth€its€findings€of€fact€and€conclusionsÏof€law,€which€are€incorporated€herein€by€reference;Ìà àÌà àWhereupon,€it€appears€to€the€Court€that€the€Memorandum€OpinionÏof€the€Panel€should€be€accepted€and€approved;€andÌÌà àIt€is,€therefore,€ordered€that€the€Panelððs€findings€of€act€andÏconclusions€of€law€are€adopted€and€affirmed,€and€the€decision€of€theÏPanel€is€made€the€Judgment€of€the€Court.ÌÌà àCosts€on€appeal€are€taxed€€to€the€plaintiff„appellant,€Vernon€HarrisÏandÌGilbert€and€Faulkner.€surety,€for€which€execution€may€issue€ifÏnecessary.€€ÌÌ06/03//97à àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌÌÌà àœÔ€2Ô