Senate Judiciary Committee begins budget hearings
The Senate Judiciary Committee today began reviewing the budgets of agencies under its jurisdiction. First up was the District Attorneys General Conference for which the committee recommended about half of the new positions the weighted caseload study indicates are needed. The committee number came in at 31 new positions. The committee also reviewed district attorneys' needs and recommended additional funding for expert and interpreter services and victim witness coordinators. The public defenders were up next with one expansion request for 40 new positions; the committee recommended 19. Finally, Attorney General Paul Summers presented his budget request of $3,050,000, which includes funds to increase entry-level salaries from $40,000 to $48,000. A new loan relief program proposed by Summers was deferred for two weeks to allow the committee to gather additional information about the proposal. The TBI budget was approved as submitted by Governor Bredesen.
Click on the category of your choice to view summaries of today’s opinions from that court, or other body. A link at the end of each case summary will let you download the full opinion in PDF format. To search all opinions in the TBALink database, go to our OpinionSearch page. If you have forgotten your password or need to obtain a password, you can look it up on TBALink at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi.
02 - TN Supreme Court
00 - TN Worker's Comp Appeals
00 - TN Supreme Court - Rules
08 - TN Court of Appeals
01 - TN Court of Criminal Appeals
00 - TN Attorney General Opinions
00 - Judicial Ethics Opinions
00 - Formal Ethics Opinions - BPR
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below.
All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password or need to obtain a password,
you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi
Here's how you can obtain full-text version. We recommend you download the Opinions to your computer and then
open them from there. Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This should give you the option to
download the original document. If not, you may need to right-click on the URL to get the option to save the file
to your computer. Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view
and save a plain-text version of the opinion. Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink.
This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Howard H. Vogel
| KAITLYN CALAWAY EX REL. KATHLEEN CALAWAY v. JODI SCHUCKER, M.D.
Carroll C. Johnson, III, and Timothy Holton, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kaitlyn
Calaway, ex rel. Kathleen Calaway.
Darrell E. Baker, Jr., David Shaw Sadlow, and Deborah Whitt, Memphis, Tennessee, for the
appellee, Jodi Schucker, M.D.
Craig P. Sanders and Marty R. Phillips, Jackson, Tennessee, for Amicus Curiae, Tennessee Medical Association.
John A. Day, Brentwood, Tennessee, for Amicus Curiae, Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association.
Pursuant to Rule 23, we accepted four certified questions of law from the United States District
Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The third certified question is the central question
of the four and is dispositive of the others: Is the three-year statute of repose for medical
malpractice in Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-116, which contains no exception for
minority, tolled during a plaintiff's minority? Our answer is that the three-year statute of repose
for medical malpractice actions is not tolled during the plaintiff's minority. Giving effect to the
plain language of the statute and finding no exception for minority among the two express
exceptions in it - and cognizant of our constitutional role as interpreters, not makers, of the
law - we hold that plaintiffs in their minority are bound by the three-year medical malpractice
statute of repose. However, in order to avoid undue hardship to potential plaintiffs who have
justly relied upon federal court and lower court precedents erroneously stating the opposite rule,
the new rule we announce today is to apply prospectively only. Therefore, for cases commenced
on or before December 9, 2005, we hold that the plaintiff's minority tolls the medical
malpractice statute of repose. For cases commenced after December 9, 2005, we hold that the
plaintiff's minority does not toll the medical malpractice statute of repose.
Corrected Case. Originally published 12/09/2005.
Dissenting Opinion by HOLDER and ANDERSON
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID IVY
With Dissenting/Concurring Opinion and Appendix
Robert Wilson Jones, Public Defender; Tony N. Brayton, Assistant Public Defender; and Garland
Ergüden, Assistant Public Defender, Memphis, Tennessee, for the Appellant, David Ivy.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; Angele M.
Gregory, Assistant Attorney General; William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; Amy Weirich,
Assistant District Attorney General; and Gerald Harris, Assistant District Attorney General, for the
Appellee, State of Tennessee.
The defendant, David Ivy, was convicted of premeditated first degree murder and was sentenced to
death. In imposing a death sentence, the jury found that two aggravating circumstances, i.e., the
defendant was previously convicted of one or more felonies whose statutory elements involved the
use of violence to the person and the murder was committed for the purpose of avoiding, interfering
with, or preventing a lawful arrest or prosecution of the defendant or another, had been established
beyond a reasonable doubt. Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 39-13-204(i)(2) and (6) (Supp. 1999). In addition,
the jury determined that the evidence of aggravating circumstances outweighed the evidence of
mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at (c). The Court of Criminal Appeals
affirmed the convictions and the death sentence.
After the appeal was docketed in this Court, we entered an order identifying eight issues for oral
argument. Having reviewed the record and applicable authority, we now hold that: 1) the evidence
was sufficient to support the first degree murder conviction; 2) the trial court did not err in
impaneling an anonymous jury; 3) the trial court properly ruled that the victim's statements were
admissible under the "forfeiture by wrongdoing" hearsay exception; 4) the evidence supported the
jury's findings that the two aggravating circumstances were proven beyond a reasonable doubt; 5)
the trial court erred during the sentencing phase in instructing the jury that two of the five prior
felony convictions relied on by the prosecution involved violence to a person, but the error was
harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; 6) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to introduce
the defendant's prior indictment for first degree murder in the sentencing phase of the trial where the
defendant had been convicted of second degree murder, but the error did not affect the outcome; 7)
the trial court erred in ruling that defense counsel could not argue residual doubt as a mitigating
circumstance during the sentencing phase, but the error did not affect the outcome; and 8) the
evidence of aggravating circumstances outweighed the evidence of mitigating circumstances beyond
a reasonable doubt, and the death sentence was not arbitrary or disproportionate. We also agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals' conclusions with respect to the remaining issues, the relevant portions of which are included in the appendix. Thus, the Court of Criminal Appeals' judgment is affirmed.
Opinion Dissenting in Part and Concurring in Part by BIRCH
Appendix (excerpts from the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision)
AMSOUTH BANK v. ANNA CUNNINGHAM
John R. Colvin, Winchester, Tennessee, and Hugh P. Garner, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Anna Cunningham.
Michael H. Knowlton, Cookeville, Tennessee, and Joseph F. Edwards, Algood, Tennessee, for the
appellee, AmSouth Bank.
Anna Cunningham, the wife of a comatose veteran who suffered a stroke at a Veterans' Administration Medical Center in 1997, was appointed conservator of the estate and person of her husband at the inception of the conservatorship in 1997. In 2000, AmSouth Bank filed a petition to be appointed conservator of the estate of the ward, contending Mrs. Cunningham was not properly
attending to the ward's financial affairs. The bank was appointed conservator of his estate to serve
along with Mrs. Cunningham who would continue to serve as conservator of the person. No appeal
was taken from that order. Thereafter, a power struggle between the co-conservators ensued
concerning the civil action Mrs. Cunningham commenced and was maintaining in federal court on
behalf of the ward and herself against the Department of Veterans' Affairs. Countervailing pleadings
were filed by the co-conservators. The bank sought exclusive control over the federal litigation and
Mrs. Cunningham sought to remove the bank as a conservator. Following a brief hearing, the
probate court designated AmSouth as having "exclusive control" of the ward's interest in the federal
litigation. Mrs. Cunningham appeals contending she was entitled to an evidentiary hearing prior to
any modification of her powers as a conservator and that she was denied an evidentiary hearing on
her petition to remove AmSouth. We affirm the probate court's decision to act expediently in its
continuing supervision of the conservatorship based upon what it believed to be the ward's best
interest; however, we remand Mrs. Cunningham's petition to remove AmSouth as a conservator,
finding the record sufficient to entitle her to an appropriate hearing.
PHILLIP DORROUGH v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Patrick T. McNally, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Phillip Dorrough.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael Moore, Solicitor General; and Pamela
S. Lorch, Senior Counsel, Attorney General's Office, for the appellee, Tennessee Board of Probation
This appeal involves a prisoner's challenge to a decision of the Tennessee Board of Probation and
Parole and the application of a 1997 amendment to Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 40-28-105, which was
subsequent to his conviction, that requires four votes in favor of parole for prisoners convicted of
certain crimes to be paroled. The statute previously required only three favorable votes in order to
be paroled. The prisoner contends the part of the amendment that specifies it applies to persons
"who may now be serving a sentence in a state or county correctional facility" violates statutory law
as well as the ex post facto clauses of the United States Constitution and the Tennessee Constitution.
The Chancery Court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.
IN THE MATTER OF: THE ESTATE OF ROOSEVELT DUKES, DECEASED
Johnny D. Hill, Jr., Fayetteville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Rosemary Sebastian, Executor of the
Estate of Roosevelt Dukes.
James S. Hereford, Jr., Fayetteville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Nell M. Shubert.
The matters at issue pertain to claims made against a decedent's estate. Nell Shubert timely filed
four claims against the Estate of Roosevelt Dukes for: (1) the balance owing on two promissory
notes, (2) property taxes paid on behalf of the decedent, (3) rent on real property, and (4) the
purchase of a bush hog. The executrix filed exceptions to all claims. After the time passed for filing
claims, Ms. Shubert amended her claim on the promissory notes to add a request for attorney fees.
The trial court ruled in favor of Ms. Shubert on the promissory notes including the claim for attorney
fees but denied all other claims. We affirm with one exception, finding Ms. Shubert is entitled to
recover property taxes paid on behalf of Mr. Dukes to preserve the property.
EFFIE LOUISE HAYES v. ROGER STRUTTON, BETTY STRUTTON, and GARY E. LESTER
Effie L. Hayes, Chattanooga, Tennessee, pro se.
Gary E. Lester, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for appellees.
Plaintiff's action for damages for loss of her property due to defendants' fraud was dismissed by the
Trial Court on the grounds that the issues had been decided adversely to plaintiff in prior actions
involving these issues. On appeal, we affirm.
DIANE MAYES v. JAMCO-KW, LLC, d/b/a ANDY ON CALL
Larry C. Vaughan, Knoxville, Tennessee, for appellant.
Mark A. Cowan, Morristown, Tennessee, for appellee.
The Trial Court refused to grant defendant's Tenn. R. Civ. P. Rule 60 Motion to Set Aside Judgment.
On appeal, we reverse.
TERRY WAYNE POTTS, ET AL. v. NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE
J. Russell Parkes, Wesley Mack Bryant, Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellant, Terry Wayne Potts,
individually and as next friend of Jonathon Wayne Potts.
Gerald D. Neenan, Aubrey B. Harwell, III; Eugene W. Ward, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee,
Nashville Electric Service.
The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant Nashville Electric Service in this lawsuit
arising from an accident that occurred when an NES truck malfunctioned and came to a sudden stop
on the interstate. Because NES conclusively demonstrated that no driver negligence caused the
accident and resulting injury, and because the plaintiff failed to provide evidence disputing NES's
evidence that it used reasonable care in its maintenance of the truck, we affirm the trial court's grant
of summary judgment.
ROGER THOMPSON, ET AL. v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC., a Tennessee Corporation for Profit, ET AL.
John W. Nolan, III and John Michael Garrett, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Roger
Thompson and Wife, Patsy Thompson.
Paul M. Buchanan and Julie Bhattacharya Peak, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Ruby
Tuesday, Inc. And Ruby Tuesday, LLC.
William B. Jakes, III, Nashville, Tennessee, for the Appellees, Owen, L.P. and Hold-Thyssen,
Roger Thompson sustained injuries after tripping and falling over a speed bump in a parking lot
of a shopping complex after exiting a Ruby Tuesday Restaurant. Mr. Thompson and his wife
(the Plaintiffs) subsequently filed suit against Ruby Tuesday, Inc. as lessee of the restaurant
premises, Owen L.P. as owner of the shopping complex, and Hold-Thyssen, Inc. as the lessee
and manager of the shopping complex premises, including the parking lot area where Mr.
Thompson fell. All of the defendants moved for summary judgment, which the trial court
subsequently granted. The Plaintiffs appeal arguing that disputed issues of material fact exist
from which a jury could render judgment in their favor against all defendants. We affirm in part
and reverse in part.
CITY OF CLEVELAND v. MIKE WADE dba BABYLON ADULT BOOKSTORE
Michael M. Raulston, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellant, Mike Wade dba Babylon Adult
John F. Kimball, Cleveland, Tennessee, and Ronald D. Wells and Stacy Lynn Archer, Chattanooga,
Tennessee, for the appellee, City of Cleveland.
The defendant, Mike Wade, operates an adult establishment in Bradley County under the trade name
of Babylon Adult Bookstore. He submitted an application to the City of Cleveland (the City),
seeking to establish a second adult book and video store, this one to be located within the city limits
of Cleveland. The City denied Wade’s application. It did so because it determined that the proposed
store was a sex outlet and that Wade intended to operate it at a location within 750 feet of a
residentially-zoned district, in violation of the pertinent zoning ordinance. The Cleveland City
Council, and the trial court following a bench trial, affirmed the denial of the application. Wade
appeals, arguing that the applicable ordinances of the City are content-based and unconstitutionally
vague. We affirm the trial court.
CUMECUS R. CATES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Gerald L. Gulley, Jr., Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Cumecus R. Cates.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Blind Akrawi, Assistant Attorney General;
and Randall E. Nichols, District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
The Petitioner, Cumecus R. Cates, appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post-
conviction relief. The trial court summarily dismissed the petition based on its determination
that the underlying conviction was on appeal to this Court. It is from the order of dismissal that
the Petitioner appeals. The State concedes that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing the
petition. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for further proceedings.
| Legal News
TennBarU CLE Programs
TBA Member Services
|Court rules juror identities can be withheld
|In a decision affirming the death sentence a Memphis man received for killing his girlfriend, the Tennessee Supreme Court has held for the first time that jurors' identities may be withheld if their safety could be jeopardized by disclosing their names to criminal defendants.
|Read more about the opinion
|U.S. Supreme Court will not hear Tenn. death row case
|The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday denied review of an appeal by Tennessee death row inmate Gregory Robinson. The court issued the denial of certiorari without comment. Robinson was convicted of murdering an innocent man during an argument between rival gangs in Memphis. Appeals at the state level ended with the Tennessee Supreme Court ruling that his conviction and punishment were fair, which led Robinson to seek U.S. Supreme Court review.
|Safe seats in the 12th Judicial District
|In the 12th Judicial District, most judges will face no opposition in bids for re-election. Circuit judges J. Curtis Smith (Dunlap), Buddy D. Perry (Winchester) and Thomas "Rusty" Graham (South Pittsburg) are unopposed for re-election to their respective benches, as is Chancellor Jeffrey F. Stewart (Winchester). District Attorney General Mike Taylor (Dayton) and Public Defender Philip Condra (Whitwell) will also be unopposed, reports the Chattanoogan.com. The 12th Judicial District includes Rhea, Bledsoe, Franklin, Grundy, Marion and Sequatchie counties.
|Marshall unopposed as 7th Judicial District public defender
|Tom Marshall, Anderson County's public defender since 1989, has announced that he will seek re-election. Read about Marshall's tenure in this article by the
|TV shows have jury expecting more
|Most TV viewers are smart enough to understand the difference between real life justice and crime shows, but shows such as CSI have begun to blur the line between fact and fiction, writes Melissa Dribben of Knight Ridder Newspapers. She cites legal experts who have identified a new trend: for the last few years jurors have been exhibiting the "CSI effect," demanding more scientific evidence of guilt and changing the way lawyers prepare cases. Read her story in the
|Physicians get limited immunity for treating evacuees
|A bill giving limited immunity in declared emergencies to physicians who volunteer to treat evacuees cleared its first hurdle today. The bill (HB 2526) was characterized by its sponsor House Judiciary Committee Chair Joe Fowlkes (D-Cornersville) as "a close cousin to the Good Samaritan Law" passed several years ago. The legislation now goes to the full Judiciary Committee.
|Preservation trusts legislation moves forward
|Legislation to permit trusts to run 360 years, notwithstanding the rule against perpetuities, and to permit individuals to establish their own spendthrift trusts was heard in the House Judiciary Civil Practice Subcommittee this morning and deferred to next week. The bill, HB 2422 (with companion Senate bill SB 2408) has a four-year window to set aside the spendthrift provisions for fraud, after which, the assets would be protected.
|Read the bill here
|TennBarU CLE Programs
|Patents commissioner to speak at TBA forum
|U.S. Commissioner for Patents John Doll will headline a strong list of speakers for the upcoming Intellectual Property Law Forum being presented by the TBA's Intellectual Property Law Section. The forum, now in its third year, has programming for attorneys new to the field and specialists. It will be held April 27-28 in Nashville at the Tennessee Bar Center and the Doubletree Hotel downtown.
|Learn more or register
|TBA Member Services
|Make the most of your TBA membership.
|Contact Membership Director Sarah Hendrickson for more information on our money saving member benefits. Call 800.899.6993 or email email@example.com