ESTATE OF THOMAS R. RALSTON v. ESTATE OF FRED R. HOBBS - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Apr 19, 2012

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

William Kennerly Burger, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Estate of Fred R. Hobbs.

Attorneys 2:

John H. Baker III, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellee, Estate of Thomas R. Ralston.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

The defendant appeals from an Order of Sale of real property, which was sold pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 69.07 to satisfy a money judgment against the defendant. We have concluded that the defendant waived many of the issues raised and, as for its issue challenging the sufficiency of the notice of the sale, the sale may not be set aside on this ground because Rule 69.07(4) expressly provides that bona fide purchasers for value at the sale shall take free of any defects concerning notice. The purchaser here is a bona fide purchaser for value; thus, we affirm.

Attachments: