IN RE: CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOHN DANIEL TATE - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Sep 18, 2012

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

John Daniel Tate, Franklin, Kentucky, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2:

Paul Toby Housch, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, David E. Tate.

Judge(s): BENNETT

This is an interlocutory appeal as of right from the trial court’s denial of a motion for recusal. Having reviewed the appellant’s petition for recusal appeal pursuant to the de novo standard as required under Rule 10B, §2.06, we affirm the trial court’s decision to deny the petitioner’s motion for recusal.

Attachments: