KATHRYN A. DUKE v. HAROLD W. DUKE, III - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Oct 3, 2012

Head Comment: With dissenting opinion

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Jacqueline B. Dixon, James L. Weatherly, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Harold W. Duke, III.

Attorneys 2:

Helen Sfikas Rogers, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Kathryn A. Duke.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

The father in this post-divorce action has filed a petition for recusal appeal seeking an interlocutory appeal as of right pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B from the trial court’s denial of his August 13, 2012, motion for recusal. We have reviewed the petition pursuant to the de novo standard of review as required by Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B § 2.06, and we affirm the trial court’s decision to deny the motion for recusal.