AUDIO VISUAL ARTISTRY v. STEPHEN TANZER - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Brittany Sims on Dec 26, 2012

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Edward M. Bearman, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Stephen Tanzer.

Attorneys 2:

Randall J. Fishman and Richard S. Townley, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Audio Video Artistry.

Judge(s): STAFFORD

This is a breach of contract case. Appellant/Homeowner contracted with Appellee for the installation of a “smart home” system. After myriad problems arose, Appellant fired Appellee, who filed the instant lawsuit to collect the unpaid balance for equipment and installation. The trial court determined that the primary purpose of the parties’ agreement was the sale of goods and applied Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The court granted judgment in favor of Appellee, but allowed certain offsets for items rejected by Appellant. Appellant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in applying the UCC, and in its calculation of damages. Appellant also appeals the trial court’s determination that the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act does not apply. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Attachments: