RICHARD MADKINS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Jul 5, 2013

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Richard Madkins, pro se, Henning, Tennessee, as the appellant.

Attorneys 2:

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; and Jeffrey D. Zentner, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): BIVINS

Richard Madkins (“the Petitioner”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The habeas corpus court summarily dismissed his petition without a hearing, and the Petitioner now appeals. On appeal, the Petitioner presents three claims: (1) that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights when it sentenced him to twenty-five years for his especially aggravated robbery conviction; (2) that the trial court did not have authority to sentence the Petitioner as a Range I offender because the State waived Range I sentencing when it filed a notice of intent to seek Range III punishment; and (3) that the Petitioner’s sentence violates principles of double jeopardy. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the habeas corpus court’s summary dismissal of the petition for habeas corpus relief.

Attachments: