VARIO TALLEY V. STATE OF TENNESSEE - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Aug 2, 2013

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Eric Mogy, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Vario Talley.

Attorneys 2:

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General & Reporter; Clarence E. Lutz, Assistant Attorney General; Amy Weirich, District Attorney General; and Jennifer Morris, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): BIVINS

Vario Talley (“the Petitioner”) filed a petition for post-conviction relief from his convictions for aggravated robbery and carjacking. In his petition, he alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, the post-conviction court denied relief, and this appeal followed. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that his counsel at trial was ineffective in failing to object to the admissibility of video surveillance evidence. Upon our thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the postconviction court.

Attachments: