SHARON LYNN PUCKETT v. BOBBY WAYNE PUCKETT - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Aug 15, 2013

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Sharon Lynn Puckett, Kingsport, Tennessee, pro se appellant.

Attorneys 2:

Mark S. Hanor, Kingsport, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bobby Wayne Puckett.

Judge(s): SWINEY

Sharon Lynn Puckett (“Wife”) sued Bobby Wayne Puckett (“Husband”) for divorce. After a trial, the Trial Court entered its order on October 4, 2012 finding and holding, inter alia, that Husband was entitled to a divorce on the grounds of Wife’s inappropriate marital conduct, that Wife was guilty of perjury, and that Wife was in contempt of court both for selling property during the pendency of the divorce in violation of the restraining order and for possessing a cell phone in court. Wife appeals raising the sole issue of whether the Trial Court erred in refusing to grant her motion for recusal. We hold that Wife failed to show any grounds justifying recusal, and we affirm.

Attachments: