KIRBY MIRANDA GENTRY v. MICHAEL ANTHONY GENTRY - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on May 28, 2014

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Philip M. Jacobs, Cleveland, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kirby Miranda Gentry.

Attorneys 2:

No appearance by, or on behalf of, Michael Anthony Gentry.

Judge(s): SUSANO

In this post-divorce case, the trial court entered an order on March 12, 2012, incorporating a permanent parenting plan. The order states that “[t]his matter shall be reviewed in one year.” On April 18, 2013, the court entered an order stating that “the Court, sua sponte, finds that the Permanent Parenting Plan attached to the Order of [March 12, 2012], should in fact be a Temporary Parenting Plan and by this Order [the court] corrects such.” We hold that under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-404(a) (2010), which provides that “[a]ny final decree or decree of modification in an action for absolute divorce . . . involving a minor child shall incorporate a permanent parenting plan,” the parenting plan incorporated by the trial court’s March 12, 2012 order was a permanent plan. Because of the mandatory statutory language, the trial court was without authority to subsequently “convert” it to a temporary parenting plan. Consequently, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Attachments: