STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTONIO LAMONT FREEMAN - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Oct 16, 2014

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Sharlina Pye-Mack, Hendersonville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Antonio Lamont Freeman.

Attorneys 2:

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Brent C. Cherry, Senior Counsel; L. Ray Whitley, District Attorney General; and Lytle Anthony James, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): WILLIAMS

The defendant, Antonio Lamont Freeman, was convicted of one count of possession of contraband in a penal facility, a Class C felony. On appeal, the defendant argues: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in removing the defendant from the courtroom during his trial; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by introducing evidence into the record during the motion for new trial; (3) the trial judge’s alleged continued acts of prejudice warrant a new trial; (4) the State committed prosecutorial misconduct when it assumed facts not in evidence; (5) the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence; and (6) numerous grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Attachments: