LANDREO LURRY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Nov 17, 2014

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Landreo Lurry, Atlanta, Georgia, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; David H. Findley, Senior Counsel; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General; and Reginald Henderson, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): GLENN

The pro se petitioner, Landreo Lurry, appeals the order of the trial court dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that his petition failed to state a claim for habeas relief. The petitioner argues that he is entitled to habeas corpus, error coram nobis, and post-conviction relief because his Tennessee burglary convictions, which were used to enhance his federal firearms sentence, occurred following the improper transfer of his case from juvenile to criminal court without a transfer hearing or the representation of counsel. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the petition.

Attachments: