STATE OF TENNESSEE v. THOMAS WILLIAM BROWN - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Feb 4, 2015

Head Comment: CORRECTION: In the intro paragraph. "evidence was contrary to the weight of the verdict" should be "verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence."

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

David L. Raybin and Vincent P. Wyatt (on appeal), Nashville, Tennessee; and Lee E. Dryer (at trial), Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant, Thomas William Brown.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Clark B. Thornton, Senior Counsel; Kim R. Helper, District Attorney General; and Mary Katharine White, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): PAGE

Appellant, Thomas William Brown, was convicted by a jury of attempted aggravated burglary and sentenced to four years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have suppressed his statements to the police immediately after his arrest, that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, that the trial court erred by allowing the State to present evidence that witnesses identified appellant’s shirt in a “show up” procedure, that the trial court erred by allowing the CAD Operational Report into evidence during the State’s rebuttal proof, and that the trial court erred by denying a special jury instruction request. Following our careful review of the evidence, we have concluded that the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s conviction for attempted aggravated burglary and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court. Appellant’s charge is dismissed.

Attachments: