SUSAN ISBELL v. WILLIAM G. HATCHETT, ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Feb 23, 2015

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Philip B. Seaton, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Susan Isbell.

Attorneys 2:

Betty Stafford Scott, Medina, Tennessee, and Linda L. Holmes, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellees, William G. Hatchett and Julia D. Hatchett.

Judge(s): GIBSON

This appeal involves claims arising from a settlement agreement allegedly entered by two of the parties to settle previous lawsuits. Appellant filed a complaint against Appellees alleging four causes of action: (1) tortious interference with a contractual obligation; (2) abuse of judicial process; (3) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) conspiracy to deny Appellant her rights under the settlement agreement. Appellees responded by filing a joint motion to dismiss. The trial court found that three of Appellant‘s causes of action for tortious interference, breach of good faith, and conspiracy each required the existence of a contract and dismissed those claims based on a finding that the settlement agreement was void and unenforceable. The trial court also dismissed Appellant‘s abuse of judicial process claim after finding ?no evidence whatsoever that [Appellees] or their counsel of record did anything improper that would support a cause of action for abuse of process.? On appeal, we reverse the trial court‘s finding that the settlement agreement was void and therefore reverse the dismissal of Appellant‘s claims requiring a contract. Additionally, we hold that because the trial court did not consider any extraneous evidence in dismissing the abuse of judicial process claim, the trial court erred in applying a summary judgment standard with regard to that claim. Because we find that the complaint sufficiently alleged abuse of judicial process, we also reverse the trial court‘s dismissal of that claim.

Attachments: