IN RE JAIDEN W., ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Apr 24, 2015

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Greg W., Manchester, Tennessee, Pro Se

Attorneys 2:

Eric J. Burch, Manchester, Tennessee, for the appellee, Jessica J.

Judge(s): ARMSTRONG

This is the third appeal of this case, involving the issue of child support and arrears. In the second appeal, this Court remanded the case to the trial court for a determination of Appellant Father and Appellee Mother’s respective incomes for the period of August 22, 2008 through September 28, 2009. Based upon Mother’s testimony at the hearing on remand, the trial court set Mother’s income for the relevant period at $300 per month. Father appeals, arguing that, based upon the trial court’s previous finding that Mother was voluntarily unemployed, the trial court should have imputed income to Mother at the statutory rate. Because the law of the case is that the trial court should determine the parties’ actual circumstances, we conclude that the court correctly set Mother’s income as the amount she actually earned. Affirmed and remanded.

Attachments: