MARK THOMAS WHITTEN v. DANA NICOLE WILLIS WHITTEN - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Jun 19, 2015

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Casey Adam Long and William Thomas Mullican, III, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant, Dana Nicole Willis Whitten.

Attorneys 2:

S. Jason Whatley and George Clark Shifflett, III, Columbia, Tennessee, for the appellee, Mark Thomas Whitten.

Judge(s): GIBSON

Mother appeals from the trial court’s post-divorce determination that a modification of the parenting plan to designate Father as the primary residential parent of their children was in the children’s best interest. Mother contends the trial court erred in considering statements of the parties’ child made outside of court. Mother also contends the trial court erred in its application of the best interests factors set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-106. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Attachments: