PATRICIA BAZEMORE v. PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC., ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Chandra Williams on Jul 30, 2015

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Grace E. Daniell, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patricia Bazemore.

Attorneys 2:

Neil A. Brunetz, Robert F. Parsley, and Jennifer W. Terry, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellee, Performance Food Group, Inc.

Judge(s): SUSANO

Patricia Bazemore brought this action against her former employer, Performance Food Group, Inc. (PFG) and Barry Pearson, a former employee of PFG. Ms. Bazemore claimed that, while she and Mr. Pearson were working for PFG, she was subjected to a pattern of unwanted sexual harassment by him – conduct that she alleges created a hostile work environment in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA). As a result of the unwanted sexual harassment, Ms. Bazemore also alleged constructive discharge, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligent supervision and retention.1 PFG subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that no genuine issue of material fact exists in support of Ms. Bazemore’s claims against PFG as an entity. The trial court ultimately granted PFG’s motion for summary judgment after finding (1) no evidence of a hostile work environment; (2) facts indicating that PFG took reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment from occurring; (3) proof that PFG’s response to Ms. Bazemore’s complaint was objectively reasonable; (4) insufficient evidence to support the claims of either intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress; and (5) no proof of negligent retention and supervision by PFG. We affirm.

Attachments: