STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDRE DE’LANE ROSS - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Chandra Williams on Nov 24, 2015

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Andre De’Lane Ross, Adelanto, California, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; and M. Todd Ridley, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): THOMAS

The Appellant, Andre De’Lane Ross, appeals from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s denial of his Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion for correction of a clerical error on the face of his possession of cocaine judgment. In this appeal, the Appellant submits that the trial court erred in denying his motion because, at the guilty plea hearing, the court found that his plea to this charge lacked a sufficient factual basis but a guilty judgment was, thereafter, erroneously entered. Based on our review, we dismiss the appeal.

Attachments: