STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROY CHERRY - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Amelia Ferrell Knisely on Feb 9, 2016

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Andre B. Mathis, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Roy Cherry.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Rachel E. Willis, Senior Counsel; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General; and Shannon McKenna, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): GLENN

The defendant, Roy Cherry, appeals the termination of his judicial diversion, arguing that he was denied his fundamental due process right to confront the witnesses against him and that the trial court did not make required findings of fact regarding the evidence it relied on in its decision. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court terminating the defendant's diversion.

Attachments: