JEREMY DAVID PARVIN v. JACKIE LaDEAN NEWMAN - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Dec 9, 2016

Head Comment: With dissenting opinion by Bennett

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Phillip L. Davidson, Brentwood, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jeremy David Parvin.

Attorneys 2:

John P. Konvalinka and Katherine H. Lentz, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellee, Jackie LaDean Newman.

Judge(s): FRIERSON

In this post-divorce action, the husband filed a complaint alleging abuse of process on the part of the wife during the divorce proceedings. He asserted that prior to the parties' stipulation to grounds for divorce and presentation of a settlement agreement, subsequently adopted by the trial court in a final divorce judgment, the wife had filed a motion for contempt against him with the intent to harass him, cause him to incur unnecessary expense, and “weaken his resolve” to litigate for more favorable terms. The wife filed a motion to dismiss this action, which the trial court treated as a motion for summary judgment because the wife had requested that the court consider the record of the divorce proceedings. Following a hearing, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the wife upon finding, inter alia, that the husband's complaint was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Upon the wife's subsequent motion, the trial court imposed a sanction against the husband's counsel, pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 11.02, in the amount of $9,745.25, comprising the wife's reasonable attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending against this action. The husband appeals. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm. We deny the wife's request for attorney's fees on appeal.