BOBBY D. MURRAY, ET AL. v. MICHAEL MURPHY, ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Stacey Shrader Joslin on Dec 29, 2016

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Bobby Murray, Harriman, Tennessee, appellant, pro se.

Attorneys 2:

Loretta Murray, Harriman, Tennessee, appellant, pro se.

Martin W. Cash, Jr., Kingston, Tennessee, for the appellees.

Judge(s): FRIERSON

The pro se appellants, Bobby Murray and Loretta Murray, appeal from an order of the Trial Court which does not resolve all the issues and claims raised in the consolidated proceedings below. The appellees, Michael Murphy and Vicki Murphy, have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal arguing that the lack of a final order deprives this Court of jurisdiction. Because the appellants concede in their response to the motion to dismiss that “the case is not over and the Final Order is not yet made,” it appears that the motion to dismiss is well-taken and this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Attachments: