STATE OF TENNESSEE v. OCTAVIUS FLYNN and DERRICK BENSON - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on May 8, 2017

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Howard B. Manis, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Octavius Flynn.

Attorneys 2:

Eric Mogy (on appeal) and Neil Umsted (at trial) Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Derrick Benson.

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; David H. Findley, Senior Counsel; Amy P. Weirich, District Attorney General; and Colin Campbell and Neal Oldham, Assistant District Attorneys General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): WILLIAMS

The Defendants, Octavius Flynn and Derrick Benson, appeal their convictions for second degree murder and their respective sentences of twenty-five and twenty-four years. On appeal, the Defendants argue, either individually or collectively, that (1) the trial court erred in denying their motions to sever; (2) a witness’s identification of Mr. Flynn in a photographic array was unreliable and should have been suppressed; (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions; (4) the trial court erred in denying Mr. Flynn’s motion to dismiss due to spoliation of evidence; (5) the jury failed to follow the trial court’s instructions and improperly compromised on a verdict of second degree murder; and (6) the sentences are excessive. Upon reviewing the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.