BETTY C. THOMAS V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Jul 5, 2017

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Betty C. Thomas, Franklin, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2:

Edmund Scott Sauer, Brian Robert Epling, and Harold Frederick Humbracht, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Bank of America of North Carolina.

Kelly Marie Telfeyan, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Seterus, Inc.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment to Defendants related to the foreclosure of Plaintiff’s home. She contends the trial court erred in summarily dismissing her complaint. She also contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend. Defendants insist the trial court should be affirmed in all respects. They also contend the appeal should be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Rule 27 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure and Rule 6 of the Rules of the Tennessee Court of Appeals. As Defendants contend, Plaintiff’s brief fails to comply with our appellate rules of advocacy and for this reason alone we would be justified in affirming the trial court. Nevertheless, we reviewed the record and the trial court’s actions and affirm the trial court in all respects. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Attachments: