CRAIG ROBERT NUNN v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Oct 23, 2017

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

David Louis Raybin, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Craig Robert Nunn.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter, Andre´e S. Blumstein, Solicitor General, Scott C. Sutherland, Deputy Attorney General, and Brooke K. Schiferle, Assistant Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Tennessee Department of Correction, and Herbert H. Slattery III, Attorney General.

Judge(s): GIBSON

This case involves a sex offender’s complaint for declaratory relief under state law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 raising various constitutional and other challenges to the conditions imposed on him in accordance with his sentence to community supervision for life. The trial court found that most of the offender’s constitutional claims were time-barred. The trial court reviewed the substantive merit of the remaining claims and found them meritless. As a result, the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, the Tennessee Department of Correction and the Tennessee Attorney General. The offender raises numerous issues on appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Attachments: