IN RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF OTTO TILLMAN STIEFEL - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Nov 3, 2017

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Donald Capparella and Elizabeth Sitgraves, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Otto T. Stiefel.

Attorneys 2:

Chasity Sharp Grice, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Cyle Woodhouse.

Judge(s): STAFFORD

This is a conservatorship dispute. The trial court found that there was clear and convincing evidence that Appellant was in need of a conservator. We conclude that the evidence presented at trial was not clear and convincing as to whether Appellant was in need of a conservator. Because there is some question in the record, however, as to whether the parties reached an agreement to allow the appointment of a conservator, we vacate and remand this case to determine this issue. Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

Attachments: