STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHELLE D. SHOEMAKER - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Dec 7, 2017

Court: TN Court of Criminal Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Michelle D. Shoemaker, Henning, Tennessee, pro se.

Attorneys 2:

Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General and Reporter; Alexander C. Vey, Assistant Attorney General; Tom P. Thompson, Jr., District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

Judge(s): DYER

The defendant, Michelle D. Shoemaker, appeals from the entry of an amended judgment granting her 370 days of pretrial jail credit. The basis for the defendant’s appeal is her allegation that the trial court erred in calculating her jail credits and that she is actually entitled to 520 days of pretrial credit. Following our review, we conclude that the defendant failed to state a colorable claim and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Attachments: