HSBC BANK N.A. v. VERRINA SHIELDS - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Mar 19, 2018

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Verrina Shields Bey, Memphis, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2:

Edmund S. Sauer, Alex McFall, and Brian R. Epling, Nashville, Tennessee, for HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.

Judge(s): CLEMENT

This is an appeal of a routine detainer action. Nevertheless, in her reply brief, the appellant states this case “is a ‘Tax Event’ and a ‘Pre-Paid’ account exempt from levy defendants are in commercial dishonor for non-acceptance and payment under section 3- 505, 510 of Uniform Commercial Code subject to forfeiture & collection under GAP. Verrina Shields Bey herein ‘Responds To Defendants Brief’ against Counsel for this ‘Tax Event’ to have the court rule in her favor and stop, terminate a attempted illegal, unlawful foreclosure.” Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the real property at issue was sold at foreclosure, and this is merely a detainer action in which the purchaser of the property, the appellee, is seeking possession of the property. Both the general sessions court and the circuit court of Shelby County ruled in favor of the appellee and entered judgment awarding a writ of possession to the appellee. Due to profound deficiencies in the appellant’s brief and reply brief, we dismiss the appeal.

Attachments: