LARA C. STANCIL V. TODD A. STANCIL - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Landry Butler on Apr 10, 2018

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Phillip R. Newman, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellant, Todd A. Stancil.

Attorneys 2:

Venus Brannan Niner and Ronda Y. Spurlock, Franklin, Tennessee, for the appellee, Lara C. Stancil.

Judge(s): BENNETT

In this post-divorce dispute, Mother filed a petition to modify parenting time and obtained an ex parte restraining order based upon Father’s physical altercation with his wife during parenting time with the parties’ children. After a hearing in December 2015, the trial court suspended Father’s parenting time until he took steps to address his anger management issues. At a review hearing in August 2016, the trial court determined that the suspension of Father’s parenting time was no longer in the best interest of the children and adopted the recommendations of Father’s psychologist concerning the reintegration of Father into the lives of the children. The trial court subsequently awarded Mother her attorney fees and discretionary costs incurred throughout the case. On appeal, Father asserts that he should have been awarded his attorney fees for the period of time after the December 2015 hearing and that the trial court erred in awarding Mother her discretionary costs for the same period. Both parties seek their attorney fees on appeal. We affirm the trial court’s award of attorney fees in full. With respect to discretionary costs, we affirm the trial court’s award with the exception of the costs of preparation and travel, which are not authorized by Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.04. Each party shall pay his or her own attorney fees and costs on appeal.

Attachments: