| TODAY'S OPINIONS: Friday, November 11, 2005
Following this index are summaries of each case, including its name, first paragraph, author's name, and the names of attorneys for the parties of each opinion.
00 - TN Supreme Court
00 - TN Worker's Comp Appeals
00 - TN Supreme Court - Rules
02 - TN Court of Appeals
00 - TN Court of Criminal Appeals
00 - TN Attorney General Opinions
00 - Judicial Ethics Opinions
00 - Formal Ethics Opinions - BPR
TBA members can get the full-text versions of these opinions three ways detailed below.
All methods require a TBA username and password. If you have forgotten your password or need to obtain a password,
you can look it up on-line at http://www.tba.org/getpassword.mgi
Here's how you can obtain full-text version. We recommend you download the Opinions to your computer and then
open them from there. Click the URL at end of each Opinion paragraph below. This should give you the option to
download the original document. If not, you may need to right-click on the URL to get the option to save the file
to your computer. Do a key word search in the Search Link area of TBALink. This option will allow you to view
and save a plain-text version of the opinion. Browse the Opinion List area of TBALink.
This option will allow you to download the original version of the opinion.
Howard H. Vogel
| IN THE MATTER OF: A.S., Q.S., AND J.S.
John C. Ford, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, the mother.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; and Amy T. Master, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee, Department of Children‚s Services.
Jeanah P. McClure, Guardian ad litem.
This is a mother‚s appeal of the termination of her parental rights to her three children. Mother suffers from a cocaine addiction. She has had numerous opportunities for rehabilitation but failed to stay drug-free. At the time of trial, the children had been in foster care for two years during which time Mother only exercised token visitation. The juvenile court terminated Mother‚s parental rights on grounds of abandonment, persistence of conditions, and substantial non-compliance with the permanency plan. We affirm.
MESSER GRIESHEIM INDUSTRIES, INC. v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
Gregory M. Leitner, Michael K. Alston, and Timothy L. Mickel, Chattanooga, Tennessee, Mark G. Arnold, St. Louis, Missouri, Arthur G. Seymour, Jr., Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc., d/b/a MG Industries.
W. Randall Wilson, James T. Williams, IV, and William A. Harris, III, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the Appellee Eastman Chemical Company.
Judge: D. MICHAEL SWINEY
Eastman Chemical Company („Eastmanš) and Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc. („Cryotechš) entered into an agreement whereby Cryotech would purchase non-food grade feedgas from Eastman which was roughly 78% carbon dioxide („CO2"). Cryotech then would purify the feedgas and sell it as food grade CO2. Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. („Messerš) purchased the CO2 from Cryotech. Messer in turn sold the CO2 to soft drink manufacturers. The CO2 sold to Messer was contaminated with cyanide and resulted in property damage to Messer and Messer‚s customers. In the third appeal arising from this litigation, we must determine whether the Trial Court correctly granted summary judgment to Eastman on Messer‚s claims for breach of warranty, products liability, and negligence, and whether the Trial Court properly refused to allow Messer to amend its complaint to assert a claim for negligence per se. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.