Ethics

Proposed Rule Requires Additional Support for Ethics Complaints Against Elected Officials

A new policy proposed by Rep. Mathew Hill, R-Jonesborough, would require lawmakers to take an additional step when filing an ethical complaint, NPR reports. The prospective rule change makes it necessary to obtain signatures from at least two representatives — one with firsthand knowledge or evidence of the alleged violation — in order to file a complaint against another elected official. "If there’s not corroboration, if there’s not evidence that is presented, then we are working off hearsay, we are working off gossip," Hill said in a House meeting last Thursday. The rule, according to Hill, is modeled on a biblical requirement that allegations must be corroborated. 

read more »

Legal Practice Tip: Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to Disclose Broader than Brady

The Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility issued an ethics opinion explaining that a prosecuting attorney’s ethical duty to disclose favorable information to the defense is broader than that required under federal constitutional law.“Tennessee Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8(d)" is a separate ethical obligation of prosecutors and was not meant to be coextensive with a prosecutor's legal disclosure obligations.  This ethical duty is separate from disclosure obligations imposed under the Constitution, statutes, procedural rules, court rules, or court orders. A prosecutor’s ethical duty to disclose information favorable to the defense is broader than and extends beyond Brady.  Once a prosecutor knows of evidence and information that tends to negate the guilt of the accused, or mitigates the offense, or falls within RPC 3.8( d)’s disclosure requirement, the prosecutor ordinarily must disclose it as soon as reasonably practicable.” Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163.

Roger E. Nell is the District Public Defender at 19th Judicial District of Tennessee and current Chair-Elect of TBA's Criminal Justice Section.
read more »