Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)
Attorneys:
ARGUED: Alexander Kazam, KING & SPALDING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
ARGUED: Marissa A. Wiesen, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Alexander Kazam, KING & SPALDING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
ON BRIEF: Marissa A. Wiesen, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellee.
Judge(s): BATCHELDER, COLE, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges
Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Carl Hubbard was convicted of first-degree murder in Michigan state court on September 2, 1992. Over two decades later (and long after 28 U.S.C. § 2244’s one-year limitation period had expired), Hubbard filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely. Hubbard now appeals, arguing that he is entitled to an equitable exception to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996’s (AEDPA) time bar based on a credible showing of actual innocence. See McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 386 (2013). While Hubbard presents new evidence that impeaches the State’s case against him, he fails to present evidence affirmatively demonstrating his actual innocence; he cannot prove that he did not, in fact, commit murder. Accordingly, AEDPA does not permit him to file an untimely habeas petition. We affirm.
hubbardc_041624.pdf