MARLEAN A. AMES v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Tanja Trezise on Dec 4, 2023

Head Comment: KETHLEDGE delivered a separate concurring opinion.

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON BRIEF: Edward L. Gilbert, EDWARD L. GILBERT CO., L.P.A., Akron, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ON BRIEF: Cathleen B. Slater, Megan E. Jewett, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

Judge(s): MOORE, McKEAGUE, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus

PER CURIAM. Marlean Ames sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, asserting claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation and sex. The district court granted summary judgment to the Department, holding that Ames lacked evidence of “background circumstances” necessary to establishing her prima-facie case for her claim based on sexual orientation, and that Ames lacked evidence of pretext for purposes of her sex-discrimination claim. We affirm.

Attachments: