UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDGARDO ESTERAS - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Karen Belcher on Mar 7, 2024

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Christian J. Grostic, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: ON RESPONSE: Matthew B. Kall, Jason Manion, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

Judge(s): SUTTON, Chief Judge; WHITE and THAPAR, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: On Petition for Rehearing En Banc. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Youngstown

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petition then was circulated to the full court. Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc.

Attachments: