UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. ex rel. MICHAEL ANGELO and MSP WB, LLC v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Karen Belcher on Jun 27, 2024

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: J. Alfredo Armas, ARMAS BERTRAN ZINCONE, Coral Gables, Florida, for Appellants.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Linda T. Coberly, WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Insurer Appellees.

Attorneys 3: ARGUED: Robert C. Folland, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee Insurance Services Office, Inc.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: J. Alfredo Armas, ARMAS BERTRAN ZINCONE, Coral Gables, Florida, Shereef H. Akeel, Adam S. Akeel, Samuel R. Simkins, AKEEL & VALENTINE, PLC, Troy, Michigan, John W. Cleary, Ryan H. Susman, MSP RECOVERY LAW FIRM, Coral Gables, Florida, for Appellants.

Attorneys 5: ON BRIEF: Linda T. Coberly, WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Steven M. Levy, DENTONS US LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Fred K. Herrmann, KERR, RUSSELL AND WEBER, PLC, Detroit, Michigan, for Insurer Appellees.

Attorneys 6: ON BRIEF: Robert C. Folland, BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee Insurance Services Office, Inc. David J. Farber, KING & SPALDING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

Judge(s): BOGGS, SUHRHEINRICH, and READLER, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit

CHAD A. READLER, Circuit Judge. Relators allege that Allstate Insurance violated the False Claims Act by skirting its obligations under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act. After multiple amendments by relators, the district court deemed their second amended complaint deficient in numerous respects and dismissed the case with prejudice. Because the complaint fails to state a claim for a violation of the False Claims Act, we affirm.

Attachments: