ABRAHAM ANDERSON v. ALICE MUSICK ET AL. - Articles

All Content

ABRAHAM ANDERSON v. ALICE MUSICK ET AL.

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Oct 25, 2024

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Matthew A. Grossman and Rebekah P. Harbin, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Abraham Anderson.

Attorneys 2: M. Edward Owens, Jr., Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Alice Musick and Dallas Musick.

Judge(s): USMAN

The Plaintiff sought specific performance related to a real estate transaction. The trial court denied relief, concluding that the series of papers introduced by the Plaintiff as a purported real estate contract between the parties did not constitute a valid contract. Furthermore, the trial court concluded that specific performance was inappropriate because the court could not discern hte terms of the purported contract. The Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Attachments: