DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD FREEMAN; CHRISTOPHER GILES; LOUIS RAY; RICHARD SULLIVAN; JAMES NORVELL; MICHAEL BANKS; GUY CLARK; MARIA BARALLARDOS; CARY SHERROW; JASON KEVIN SINCLAIR; KIMBERLY COULSON; TROY COULSON; ANDRE MCQUADE; DONALD DYKSHORN; TAIT THOMAS; JAMES PAUL BROWNE; WILLIAM FREDO; JON ELLARD; RHIANNA MEYERS; RANDALL JACOBS; MICHAEL PONDER; PHILIP WEEKS; KATRINA FREDO; JIMMY FLOWERS; STEVEN BRACK; KEVIN WESLEY; BRIAN LLOYD; GREGORY BUTSCHA; JERRY CARROLL; KIMBERLY CARROLL; DOMINIC EATHERTON; THOMAS EDMONDSON; RICHARD FILIAGGI; ROBERT HIGGINS; DAVID THOMPSON; DONALD SICURA v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Dec 19, 2024

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Richard C. Godfrey, R. Allan Pixton, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, John F. Bash, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Austin, Texas, Renee D. Smith, Cole T. Carter, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Jason M. Wilcox, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., Stephanie A. Douglas, BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC, Troy, Michigan, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ON RESPONSE: Douglas J. McNamara, Karina Puttieva, Madelyn Petersen, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Washington, D.C., Theodore J. Leopold, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for Appellees.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: John M. Thomas, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Kyle M. Asher, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Lansing, Michigan, Stephen A. D’Aunoy, KLEIN THOMAS LEE & FRESARD, St. Louis, Missouri, Brandon L. Boxler, KLEIN THOMAS LEE & FRESARD, Richmond, Virginia, Brian D. Schmalzbach, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Wendy Liu, PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

Judge(s): SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, MURPHY, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal.”

Attachments: