UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NASHAUN DRAKE - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Jan 28, 2025

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON BRIEF: Catherine Adinaro Shusky, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ON BRIEF: Daniel R. Ranke, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

Judge(s): United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland

Court Appealed: SUTTON, Chief Judge; KETHLEDGE and MURPHY, Circuit Judges

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Nashaun Drake pleaded guilty to several drug offenses. At Drake’s sentencing, the district court treated him as a “career offender” based, in part, on a prior marijuana conviction. The court sentenced Drake to a within-guidelines sentence of 200 months’ imprisonment. Drake now argues that his prior marijuana conviction did not qualify as the type of drug offense that can trigger the career-offender sentencing enhancement. And he argues that his 200-month sentence was unreasonable. But our binding precedent requires us to reject his first claim, and our deferential standard of review requires us to reject his second one. We affirm.

Attachments: