ROBERT HOLMAN v. THOMAS J. VILSACK , in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture; ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency - Articles

All Content

ROBERT HOLMAN v. THOMAS J. VILSACK , in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture; ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Feb 3, 2025

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Braden H. Boucek, Kimberly S. Hermann, SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, Roswell, Georgia, William E. Trachman, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, Lakewood, Colorado, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ON RESPONSE: Jeffrey E. Sandberg, Thomas Pulham, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Daniel P. Lennington, WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, David C. Tryon, Alex M. Certo, Thomas J. Gillen, THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE, Columbus, Ohio, for Amici Curiae.

Judge(s): STRANCH, LARSEN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Jackson

The court delivered an order denying the petition for rehearing en banc. THAPAR, J. (pp. 3–10), delivered a separate opinion dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, in which BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, and READLER, JJ., concurred.

Attachments: