KENT E. BARTON, JR. v. CANDAYCE J. KELLER - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Azya Thornton on Apr 8, 2025

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Rachael E. Putnam, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Kent E. Barton, Jr.

Attorneys 2: Paola Palazzolo-West, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Candayce J. Keller.

Judge(s): STAFFORD

Petitions involving child custody and support were filed in juvenile court. After a juvenile court magistrate ruled on the custody issues, Father filed a request for rehearing before the juvenile court judge under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-107(d)(1)(E). The juvenile court judge affirmed the decision of the magistrate without explanation or addition. Because neither the juvenile court magistrate nor the juvenile court judge adjudicated the pending child support matter, we dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Attachments: