PATRICK D. REED v. HAROLD MAY, Warden - Articles

All Content

PATRICK D. REED v. HAROLD MAY, Warden

Posted by: Azya Thornton on Apr 11, 2025

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: Aaron M. Smith, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Hilda Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Aaron M. Smith, David Debold, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP, Washington, D.C., John H. Heyburn, Laura Londoño Pardo, Azucena Marquez, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, New York, New York, for Appellant.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: Hilda Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee.

Judge(s): STRANCH, THAPAR, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Toledo

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. Patrick Reed is in prison for drug trafficking, drug possession, firearm possession, and evidence tampering. Reed claims the state trial court violated his Confrontation Clause rights when it admitted an out-of-court statement. The Ohio courts and the federal district court rejected this claim, and we affirm.

Attachments: