RENEE PEMBROKE (COOLEY) v. CHRISTOPHER EUGENE COOLEY - Articles

All Content


Posted by: Amelia Ferrell Knisely on Jan 29, 2016

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1:

Leslie Gattas Coleman and Brent A. Rose, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Christopher Eugene Cooley.

Attorneys 2:

Lara E. Butler, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Renee Pembroke (Cooley).

Judge(s): GOLDIN

This appeal concerns a post-divorce modification of alimony. During the underlying divorce proceedings, the parties executed a marital dissolution agreement providing that the husband would make payments to the wife of $8,000 per month in transitional alimony for a period of five years followed by payments of $7,500 per month in alimony in futuro for a period of five years. The agreement provided that the alimony in futuro payments could be modified by either party ?upon a showing of a material, unanticipated change in circumstances.? The agreement was incorporated into the trial court‘s final decree of divorce entered in January 2005. In April 2014, the wife filed a petition seeking to increase and extend the husband‘s alimony in futuro obligation. After a trial, the Shelby County Circuit Court found a change in circumstances warranting a modification of alimony and ordered that the husband continue to pay alimony in futuro of $6,200 per month beginning in January 2015 and continuing for a period of six years or until his retirement, whichever occurred later. The trial court also awarded the wife $30,000 as alimony in solido for attorney‘s fees. On appeal, we conclude that the record does not support the trial court‘s finding of a substantial and material change in circumstances. We therefore reverse the trial court‘s modification of the husband‘s alimony in futuro obligation. Additionally, we reverse the trial court‘s award of alimony in solido for attorney‘s fees. This matter is remanded for such further proceedings as may be necessary and are consistent with this Opinion.