ANDREI SKRIPKOV v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL - Articles

All Content

ANDREI SKRIPKOV v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Jul 20, 2020

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: Brenna Duncan, PERKINS COIE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Arthur L. Rabin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Brenna Duncan, Nathan Kelley, Andrew Caridas, PERKINS COIE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: Arthur L. Rabin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Judge(s): GILMAN, DONALD, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: On Petition for Review from the Board of Immigration Appeals

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Andrei Skripkov, a citizen of Russia, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his application for asylum and the withholding of removal. Skripkov asserted in his application that he was persecuted in his home country on account of his political opinion. He specifically contended that his anticorruption whistleblowing activities motivated Russian officials to persecute him. The IJ and the BIA, on the other hand, found that the officials were motivated solely by their pecuniary interest in furthering a corrupt scheme disrupted by Skripkov.

In his petition for review, Skripkov argues that the BIA erred in disregarding evidence that he would be criminally prosecuted for his political opinion if he is returned to Russia. For the reasons set forth below, we GRANT Skripkov’s petition for review and REMAND the case to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Attachments: