JON VAZEEN v. MARTIN SIR - Articles

All Content

JON VAZEEN v. MARTIN SIR

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Mar 4, 2021

Court: TN Court of Appeals

Attorneys 1: Jon Roozbeh Vazeen, Knoxville, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Attorneys 2: Tom Corts, Hayley Vos, and Dayne Geyer, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Martin Stephen Sir.

Judge(s): MCGEE

This appeal involves a fraud claim filed against an attorney by his former client. The attorney conceded that the client had been double-billed for some charges and repaid the client for those matters prior to trial. However, the client, now pro se, continued to pursue his claim for fraudulent billing, insisting that fraud extended to the entire invoice. He also claimed that the attorney had charged a higher hourly rate than agreed. After a bench trial, the trial court found that the client failed to demonstrate that the attorney intentionally misrepresented the amounts owed by the client and failed to present sufficient evidence of fraud. As such, the trial court dismissed the claim and granted the attorney’s request for discretionary costs. The client appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Attachments: