TAMMY M. BRAWNER v. SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE - Articles

All Content

TAMMY M. BRAWNER v. SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Dec 1, 2021

Head Comment: With dissenting opinion by READLER

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Caitlin C. Burchette, Arthur F. Knight, III, TAYLOR & KNIGHT, GP, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Attorneys 2: ON RESPONSE: Richard E. Collins, II, STANLEY, KURTZ & COLLINS, PLLC, Knoxville, Tennessee, Megha Ram, RODERICK & SOLANGE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER, Washington, D.C., David M. Shapiro, RODERICK & SOLANGE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant.

Attorneys 3: ON AMICUS BRIEF: Jeffrey C. Mando, Claire E. Parsons, ADAMS LAW, PLLC, Covington, Kentucky, D. Barry Stilz, KINKEAD & STILZ, Lexington, Kentucky, for Amicus Curiae.

Judge(s): CLAY, WHITE, and READLER, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: On Petition for Rehearing En Banc from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petition then was circulated to the full court. Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied. Judge Readler would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his original dissent and the one appended hereto.

Attachments: