UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL B. CLARK - Articles

All Content

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL B. CLARK

Posted by: Karen Belcher on Jan 24, 2022

Court: 6th Circuit Court (Published Opinions)

Attorneys 1: ARGUED: Gregory A. Napolitano, LAUFMAN & NAPOLITANO, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 2: ARGUED: Elaine K. Leonhard, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky, for Appellee.

Attorneys 3: ON BRIEF: Gregory A. Napolitano, LAUFMAN & NAPOLITANO, LLC, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant.

Attorneys 4: ON BRIEF: Charles P. Wisdom, Jr., James T. Chapman, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellee.

Judge(s): BATCHELDER, LARSEN, and READLER, Circuit Judges

Court Appealed: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Following his conviction for distribution of child pornography, Appellant Michael Clark appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and that the district court committed various evidentiary errors that require reversal. Because Clark’s arguments lack merit, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

Attachments: